• pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    18 days ago

    I can tell it’s some 32-bit millisecond counter without even opening the article. 49 days period is too specific.

    And since I did not hear anything about MacOS network stack catastrophically breaking on any servers, the impact should be small.

  • Tarambor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 days ago

    AI generated crap. Lots of people posting in /r/Apple that they’ve uptimes many times longer than this without any issue.

  • just some guy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I’ve encountered this before, on a Mac Pro 5,1. Same thing used to happen to my old Linux machine and I’ve seen it happen to Win2k waaaaaay back in the day. I recall the whole up-too-long-cant-network thing being quite common at one point. This article feels like a nothing burger.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Lol. Glad to see others using the term “nothing burger”.

      As I explained elsewhere it’s just that. Hype for a new AI model that can’t understand the big picture nor the final details and is finding non-existent bugs.

      • just some guy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s a great phrase for things like this lol

        Yeah I haven’t seen my Mac Pro 6,1 do this in the 2y it’s been living in my rack running boinc jobs. Nor my M1 mini at work that goes untouched for months at a time bc I don’t need to go there.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    These kinds of bugs have been around for ages. There was one like this in WinNT, and this was found when the OS was finally stable enough to run for as long as that…

    That this bug was found just now tells me that nobody lets a Mac run for serious lengths of time…

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Multiple reports on Apple’s community forums and open-source projects describe symptoms that match this bug precisely:

      • Apple Community #250867747: macOS Catalina — “New TCP connections can not establish.” New connections enter SYN_SENT then immediately close. Existing connections unaffected. Only a reboot fixes it.
      • Apple Community #252991075: “Mac Pro TCP/IP stops working.” TCP completely fails, but ping (ICMP) works normally.
      • Podman issue #12495: “podman machine network connectivity stalls after some uptime” on macOS 12. The VM running on macOS shows outbound TCP failure with ICMP still functional, occurring after running for multiple weeks.
        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          It seems to me like nobody bothered to measure how long it took to trigger, and those in the first two threads seem unaware that it is caused by uptime and not some other random thing

  • rbos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Didn’t windows XP have a similar bug? Related to the windows uptime counter, iirc.

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Windows 9x would crash after 49.7 days.

      Windows Vista had a bug where the network stack would crash after 497 days, but if you didn’t care about networking the rest of the OS would continue to run.

  • Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Just reading this gave me a flashback to the old Windows 9x issue where, if you left a machine running “too long”, it would crash. 😅

    Can’t recall the number of days, though. 38? 68? 78? Something like that.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      That’s not a thing.

      At 49.7 days a timer overflows. That could cause problems… It doesn’t guarantee problems.

      • Brewchin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        That’s the one. And fair enough.

        Had a couple of users tell me it crashed their PCs, but that was my only reference.