mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1337arrow-down131
arrow-up1306arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squareJelleWho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·15 days ago50% of the people is more stupid than average
minus-squarefun_times@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 days agoIn a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
minus-square🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoIf you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)
50% of the people is more stupid than average
In a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
If you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)
More of less?