• Jumpinship@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure if you’re trying to be clever? You can start a war against anyone or anything.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can attack anyone or anything but formal declarations of war are usually state actions.

      I guess I’m partly being clever and pointing out that Israel is waving this word “war” around very generously right now, because they’re always dramatizing the direness of their situation, mainly for the American audience. But technically they shouldn’t be using this word unless they recognize the state of Palestine, which they have historically refused to do.

      So, as usual, they’re trying to have it both ways.

      • KarmaTrainCaboose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure I understand. Does war declaration being a state action require recognition the state of Palestine? Or can they declare war on “Hamas” or any other entity/group of people. Or do they even have to state who they are at war against? Can they just say “we are at war”?

        • ours@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t read the article (I just get an HTTP 403 “Forbidden”, interesting) but Israel had previously talked about declaring war on Hamas itself.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This isnt a gotcha. Israel does not recognize the legitimacy of the Palestinian state, but they don’t like, pretend it doesn’t nominally exist. If Hamas considers themselves a legitimate government, they can be declared war against. They’re not legitimate, but they still exist.

        As an easy example in the US, everyone in the country doubted the legitimacy of the “Autonomous Zone” in Portland, and yet it very definitely was a thing.