• terabyterex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Running fedora is such a delight. I can wait till they have it fixed. Much better than *its release day, lets see what happens"

    • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t mind the delay much, but I’m so tried of waiting for Syncthing 2. All my other nodes are at the v2, for a very long time. Months, I don’t even remember. The older version works, but it constantly shows some issues which aren’t there. I expect the migration to 2.0 would resolve the issues. It’s there in the Fedora 44, but the 43 does not have it for some reason. I’m waiting. Otherwise it’s good.

      • bananabarbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        You could also consider just running the binary given that alternative fits your usecase? Single-user and trusting the syncthing-team, but they seem (my opinion, no affiliation, fellow user only) highly trustworthy. The binary auto-updates and you don’t have to wait for the distro package maintainers to update the repos. Might be an acceptable tradeoff in the case of syncthing, or maybe not - just raising as an alternative for you to consider.

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh wow, I was not aware of this option! I think I’d wait for fiesta to upgrade, since it’s weeks anyway. But in general, that’s very useful to have it updating itself not supervised! A potential attack surface, but I guess for most casual users that’s not a real threat. Thanks for letting me (and I hope someone else too) know!