NightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoNo evidence yet of Iran link to Hamas attack, says Israeli militarywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down17
arrow-up1147arrow-down1external-linkNo evidence yet of Iran link to Hamas attack, says Israeli militarywww.theguardian.comNightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareLostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down6·2 years agoToo late Murdoch owned Wall Street Journal already sold the lie there was Iranian involvement. You would think people would learn after the Iraq War.
minus-squareKevonLooney@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 years ago Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas spokesman, meanwhile told the BBC that the group had direct backing for the attack from Iran. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67044182 Lie or not, it’s coming straight from the horse’s mouth.
minus-squareMxM111@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoEven in this article it is said that Iran did provide support to Hamas (money, weapons). What is not evident, that there was coordination and support for this particular operation. For me, it looks like splitting hairs.
Too late Murdoch owned Wall Street Journal already sold the lie there was Iranian involvement. You would think people would learn after the Iraq War.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67044182
Lie or not, it’s coming straight from the horse’s mouth.
Even in this article it is said that Iran did provide support to Hamas (money, weapons). What is not evident, that there was coordination and support for this particular operation. For me, it looks like splitting hairs.