According to Rimu Atkinson, the main developer of PieFed, all PieFed instances come with a 3000-long block list of resources that cannot be linked to. These include all sorts of right-wing outlets. There is no easy opt-out, forcing existing instances to follow the blocklist.

The flagship PieFed instance also rolled out a feature marking various other sorts of outlets - among them, resources considered AI slop and Marxist outlets. These are specific to piefed.social.

Related discussion: https://piefed.social/comment/11254679

Why YSK: Many users have hard time choosing between Lemmy, PieFed, and Kbin/Mbin. Users that prefer a more curated and politically uniform experience might prefer PieFed over the alternatives. Users that are right-wing, Marxist, or generally concerned about global censorship of the Fedi-/Threadiverse, might opt for other options instead.

Note: The post is only meant to inform users of the potentially important differences between Threadiverse platforms. Any ideologically charged discussions are better left in the respective topic.

  • Caveman@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    goddamnit goddamnit goddamnit

    Why does every fediverse reddit clone have to pull this shit? Like that blocklist isn’t horrible - now - but what if the dude pulls a fetterman and next year he is blocking shit you agree with? Politically motivated censorship is the type of thing many people are trying to get away from.

    • Sergio@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      what if the dude pulls a fetterman and next year he is blocking shit you agree with?

      Then you move to another instance.

    • John@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      piefed already blocks by default lemmy.ml, hexbear, and lemmygrad. lol … it’s just a lib echo chamber.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why does every fediverse reddit clone have to pull this shit?

      People want to live in Echo Chambers.

      Politically motivated censorship is the type of thing many people are trying to get away from.

      Nah, most of 'em just want to be the ones doing the censoring.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      blocking trash sites on your own instance, and providing default settings is perfectly reasonable.

      • Caveman@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you can’t opt out as an instance its a bit more than “default settings” imo

        And my whole issue is not wanting too wide a net being labeled under “trash sites” I hate Fox News and Infowars but I also hate them being hidden from me with no way to get around that besides switching from piefed to a different service. Who is to say what the next trash site will be? Spam is one thing but I don’t need a net nanny.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          who can’t opt out? just use a different instance if you dont like an instances setting. no one owes you anything. or run your own and just change the setting.

              • p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                No, but basically no instance will do that, and for the vast majority of people on this planet just self hosting it is so far out of their knowledge that forking it would be inconceivable for them

              • p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Literally yesterday I tried hosting a piefed instance, with no intervention, it applied these exact lists, and there was no option to change it which is why I switched back to self hosted lemmy

                • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  so no proof got it. note other people in the thread mentioned DB records you need to clear out. fairly trivial work if your hosting systems.

                  • p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    I’m not going to look through the code for proof for an online argument, but the reason I believe that is because there is/was code that searched for anonymous and No. in any uploaded image, and failed with a fake error message when you try to upload it

              • p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                What? You mean lemmy? I have one. If you mean a different piefed instance, that’s what I was saying, you’d need to fork the pyfedi repo to remove the list, it’s on every instrnce of piefed

                • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Make your own and opt out or use lemmy since you’re complaining specifically about the features that differentiate piefed. Like this is a seriously dumb complaint. Like why would you want active disinformation sources? What benefit does that provide to discourse? Or do you just want disinformation to be disseminated? It’s not a matter of fuckin opinion, these sites propagate actual fake news and that’s their primary purpose. Fox news literally argued in court they’re purely entertainment, like the onion.

                  • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Fox news literally argued in court they’re purely entertainment, like the onion.

                    Wait, they did? Wow, accuracy!

          • Caveman@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            The original post we are commenting on stated instances could not opt out. Or at least I thought it did, I don’t know how to check edit history. I’m now aware thats untrue.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              and provided zero proof of this fact. feel free to provide that proof. I’m too lazy to go research the codebase but i highly doubt they hard coded it.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Blocking known disinfo sources is not politically motivated censorship, it’s reality motivated censorship.