• Jaderick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    peer reviewed properly

    Is the important bit here. The timeline from that Wikipedia article shows it was published in 2005 and work disproving it’s claim came around in 2006.

    If a scientists work is retracted it really kills any more funding they receive. They use examples like the DRBG one as what not to be.