Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s provided as is, no warranty, no guarantee. If you built your life around it, that’s on you, not the dev. If you want something else, do it yourself or pay somebody to do it for you.

    • binux@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fair, but a little empathy for rsync users who only mean well would go a long way. The everyone-for-themselves mentality doesn’t tend to be very helpful most of the time, if ever.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Meaning well and blasting the rsync maintainer with absolutist anti-LLM messages are very different things.

        Th rsync maintainer is ironing out issues. Use an old version and let him cook. Once things are stable, then pull the new version. If you’re on arch or another unstable distro that always pulls the latest version, this is what you signed up for. Staying on the bleeding edge means you’ll bleed.

        It doesn’t excuse attacking he maintainer who seems to be making a genuine effort. That shows a lack of empathy.

        • binux@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Meaning well and blasting the rsync maintainer with absolutist anti-LLM messages are very different things.

          …Which is why I specified those who only mean well. Obviously that doesn’t include the less pleasant crowd.