• littleomid@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    When I have vacation, I don’t want to be bothered with work related stuff either. I understand their want for a vacation, and they should not be blamed. The system that allows this chicanery is at fault here.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      The total vote count required shouldn’t change if someone’s on vacation.

      If they can’t vote remotely or by proxy, then the vote should either be delayed or extended, or anyone absent should be listed as not present or abstained. Either way the percentage of “yes” votes shouldn’t be any different from if every seat was in attendance.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          If there’s a threshold needed for a “yes” vote then it’s functionally the same, even without counting as one. I’m just saying that threshold shouldn’t go down just because someone is on vacation.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      FFS this isn’t some factory job where you punch in and out. If you can’t have your precious vacation interrupted for the sake of the nation you should find another job

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      The difference beeing is that.they do not have attendence requirements, which i am sure you do at your work, can’t just not show up.

    • DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The neat part is the system doesn’t allow it but the person that had to reject it was for this so she didnt