Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Musk is undeniably just trying to run twitter into the ground at this point.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square609fedilinkarrow-up13.77Karrow-down1159
arrow-up13.61Karrow-down1imageMusk is undeniably just trying to run twitter into the ground at this point.lemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square609fedilink
minus-squaredragontamer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 年前It’s not tweets you read. It’s tweets your web browser / app reads. Your web browser goes through 600 tweets in just 2 minutes of scrolling, maybe less.
minus-squareSlitted@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前That seems like something that should have been found during initial testing. Unless of course, they didn’t test at all.
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 年前Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 年前Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
minus-squareTheGeneral@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 年前Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
It’s not tweets you read. It’s tweets your web browser / app reads.
Your web browser goes through 600 tweets in just 2 minutes of scrolling, maybe less.
That seems like something that should have been found during initial testing. Unless of course, they didn’t test at all.
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).
Plus let’s be real anyone with a decent scraper isn’t gonna not the limit (will just switch accounts).