NSFW’d for language.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if there’s certain material which, whenever a person encounters it, changes their mind, how do you account for that?

      Wouldn’t the simplest explanation for that be that this material contains compelling arguments people aren’t seeing outside that material?

      • Zoidsberg@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The History Channel makes compelling arguments for how extra-terrestrials built the pyramids. Compelling doesn’t always equal true.

        • pantsu_professor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ancient astronaut theorists believe the pyramids were created as a form of landing platform/dock for extrasolar spacecraft.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case I’m using to to mean compelling to people with a brain, not just “history channel made a speculation so I’m sold”

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you’re taken in by conspiracy theories, it’s not because the information is compelling-but-unseen, but rather because you want to believe that

            A) information that confirms your biases is true

            B) you are privy to knowledge others don’t have.

            These two things reinforce one another.

      • SirWifflesprouts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but something can be “compelling” for any number of reasons and truth or accuracy don’t need to factor in. People like to hear what makes them feel good or confirms their existing beliefs.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Enticing arguments. The rightwing media gives an enticing view of the world, to a certain demographic. Compelling would be more if we saw people from all walks of life being convinced.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, and I know this is really out there, but maybe, just maybe, facts don’t actually care about your feelings.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but you have no idea what claims are in these materials, because you think they’re too toxic to read.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Completely untrue. I’m not afraid of news outlets. I’m not afraid of what the “others” have to say

            Pretty sure you’re talking about yourself here, champ.

      • Blue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this material contains compelling arguments

        Maybe for idiots