• jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not the beginning, ‘Device as a Service’ has been the buzzword as of late, but basically has been a thing for decades. I remember twenty years ago scratching my head at why the company I worked at paid more to lease desktops for three years than it would have cost to just buy them outright, or even finance them.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The amount we spend on cloud hosting I keep suggesting (and I think they are starting to listen) that having on-prem hardware makes financial sense again. We have the staff to run them already anyway.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Heh, to some extent I think the hardware vendors have done this to themselves.

          They try to balance “good TCO if you just buy it” but simultaneously say “but it sucks to own the equipment you need to pay us exorbitant services fees to make it easier to own”.

          Nothing unique to IT, certainly car manufacturers love to first sell you on how robust the car is and then try to scare you into thinking it’ll turn to dust if you don’t buy extended warranties…

  • 17jGuFCOn89iY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You’re still paying for the more expensive ram. It’s just baked into a higher monthly rental payment. Why pay more for ram one time when you could pay more for ram every month for the rest of your life?

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      When a company says it has a “solution” for the high price, they means they have a “solution” for the big number on the sticker. Not that they actually care about affordability.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        when the $ numbers start getting big and scary, just extend the length some more to make it look ‘cheaper’… like 8 year car loans and 50 year mortgages.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, had a car dealer try to say “the price doesn’t even matter, only the monthly payment matters, right?”

          The problem for those of us who know better: this reasoning works on most of the customers and it’s more profitable to do that than cater to more savvy customers.

    • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those of us paying attention have been waiting for this moment. It’s great living through end stage capitalism!

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Leasing is not renting

    For tech stuff basically a financial entity buys the goods for you at full MSRP (they calculate a almost 100% depreciation over the term), then you pay that full price + interest over 48/60 installments, and when you’re done, they take the goods back and sell it back via some liquidator.

    And because the financial entity bought the stuff for you especially to lease it, you’re contractually obligated to pay until the end of the contract, can’t just get it for a month and then be done with it

    You paid $1200 to use something worth $900 for four years and then it’s not yours

    Unless you’re a business and the accountant says that’s better for taxes, leasing something doesn’t make sense

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I hope you’re not saying this in general terms, because leasing absolutely has its benefits even to individuals, especially for cars.

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        for cars it makes sense only if you really need to have a new vehicle every 3 years and you really need to have an all inclusive insurance that covers everything

        otherwise you save thousands by taking a loan, get limited liability insurance, then sell it after 5-6 years

        although the absolute savings (for a newish vehicle and not a shitbox) is to get a used one ex-leasing (max 3 years old, low mileage, all maintenance made correctly because the leasing company paid for it) then sell it after 3-4 years (or keep it until it becames a shitbox)

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Heck, even paying for full comprehensive insurance, you still come out ahead by buying on a loan and keeping it for more than 3 years.

          The crux is that decently priced loans are denied to the people who actually need it, but leases are not.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Looks absurd, but I’m sure a lot of people will pay for it and next year we will have news about apple getting record profits

    I’m too tired of all this

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wasn’t this the goal from the start? With the inflated RAM prices, you not owning computing. Well, they’ll surely find some idiots.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just like investment real estate squatters buying up houses, driving up real estate costs, and then forcing you to rent.

    Next, Apple keeps jacking up lease prices.