• treesartlife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Imagine how many children could be lifted out of poverty. How many bridges and roads could be repaired. But no, that’s for suckers, right?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      In terms of roads, a lot, but probably not as much as you’re thinking. The US DOT is allowed like 300 billion in a year.

      On the other hand, saving the poorest of the poor is cheap, and 37.5 would make all the difference. The World Food Program wanted 13 this year and didn’t get it.

      • Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, actually. To the villainous scum we call our leaders, it is worth it.

        They’ve been seeding the Middle East with vengeful fury for the last 40+ years. Not only did we ensure a 100% chance of some sort of counter-offensive or rebellion to jumpstart the next war, but we’ve made doubly sure that they will echo war after war after war forever as new Muslim teens are raised and given a guiding finger at the US for all of life’s troubles, not that they’re entirely wrong.

        So up up up goes defense spending and up up up goes the war bonds and up up up goes the petrol, forever. This is how the US war machine works.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        [This ] cost trillions of dollars and millions of lives to create

        I guess all the data centers eating your local water supply are better because…smart machine thinks good? What the fuck is this timeline

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m truly clueless what you’re saying. Smart machine? You do understand I was being sarcastic…?

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember this number when they say they can’t afford any social programs …

    • Kjell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      They can’t afford any social program after all the money they spend on this war.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    Taxpayers: “$37.5b 😵‍💫”
    Heggy: “$37.5b so far!”

  • spock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t understand why people think this is a good use of their tax money. Everyone complains about state taxes when it is much less and pays for everything you see and use. Then you have federal taxes which are a massive black hole.

  • dwzap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    FWIW we’ve been seeing that amount be advertised for months. So either people talking about the fact that “the war having cost $40bn so far” were wrong months ago, or this number is under-evaluated for political reasons. Or both.

  • Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I have no sympathy for Americans caring about the tax payer cost while ignoring their complicity in imperialist wars (yes, it is plural). If you are not protesting as hard the annexation and extraction of Venezuela’s oil, the embargo of Cuba (shit, I am getting tired of listing crimes against humanity), you are not protesting war, you are protesting losing and you should not expect anyone in the world to feel sorry for you.

  • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    costs that much to do nothing lol.

    the clips i saw from those hearings are embarrassing and sum up everything wrong with our milquetoast government.

    if this guy deserves to be in the position he’s in then ask him to name at least 10 valid reasons that the iran ‘war’ is more important than feeding poverty stricken american children. i put war in parenthesis since iran is incapable of fighting back since we’re 6k miles away.

    as a bonus question ask him how long it’d take to drive a ford mustang that distance @ full throttle when considering an unlimited tank of gas. should be a cakewalk for someone in that position of power.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It does seem low, doesn’t it? It might add up, that’s a bit less than 20,000 2 million dollar missiles, and a lot of it is actually going to be on labour or other things. It is a more impressive figure when you consider how long this has been going on.

      Not to mention, the weapons being used are niche and pretty hard to replace on any reasonable timeline. It’s not the same as expending the same value in concrete or grain.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    So better be prepared to find some sponsors. Because why should the taxpayer finance Trumps follies?

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everyone is focusing on the taxpayer cost, which is of course exorbitant. But try instead thinking about how many private jets the weapon manufacturers and politicians in their pocket are getting out of it.