• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if only one percent of people want smaller phones, with the huge volume of phones sold I don’t understand how that’s not enough to justify a healthy market.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It probably doesn’t make sense to spend the time, money, and staff to develop/market a small phone for most of the manufacturers because the people that want a small phone will still buy a bigger phone if there isn’t the option for a small one. They can spend less money and make the same number of sales.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right I don’t doubt that the decision makes financial sense because I know several companies, most notably Apple, gave it a really sincere effort with enormous resources.

        But it does show that even this last supposed benefit of hyper capitalism—consumer choice—is a bit of a lie. All TVs spy on you, it’s almost impossible to buy a small car in the US, even expensive clothes are made in the same cheap fast fashion factories, and on and on.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, the same goes for headphone jacks, removable batteries, even sliding keyboards.

        I really miss being able to find a phone with features I want.

        • Sleestak_Chaka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much why I still use a Note 9. I’ve tried switching to other phones but keep going back to this phone.

          Expandable storage was great for consumers but not the big corporations. They can charge much more for storage and keep their prices high for that reason.

          As long as this phone works, I’ll stick with it.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        99% of the folks that want a particular phone will buy another one instead. Can’t discount the bullheaded consumer (like me).

      • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there is the possibility they could capture almost the whole small phone market, instead of competing against titans for a piece of the big phone market. I also don’t see how this is not still a big market that is being ignored. So many random trash phones that must be getting pitiful sales numbers, but they can’t make anything in a small size, like they used to do in huge numbers just half a decade ago?

        I get that the Mini might not reach numbers acceptable for Apple, but for some random Android manufacturers, those same numbers would be huge, and they have basically no competition right now. The first company to offer something decent in that size bracket would have that whole market to themselves.

        But no, i think they all just dream that they might beat Google and Samsung for the same 6.3-6.8" market and be rich.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      1% is nothing for a company like Apple or Samsung. Making something actually nice for 1% of the market would never pay off.

      Especially when those 1% will just buy whatever else they offer most of the time.