The new data — comprehensive and definitive — should put to rest the countervailing narratives over Musk’s management of the app. Under his stewardship, X’s daily user base has declined from an estimated 140 million users to 121 million, with a widening gap between people who check the app daily vs. monthly. X’s remaining daily users are engaged similarly as before. But the pool is shrinking. Apptopia pulls its data from more than 100,000 apps on iOS and Android, along with publicly available sources.

So apparently it lost only 13% of daily users? Thats a smaller number than I thought. Still bad news for Twitter though.

On the other hand, it shows the power of content creators and niche communities. I used less Twitter but cannot delete it because it is literally how I connect with my niche community on there.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what’s the consensus here? Does social media not include things where people use usernames, or do Reddit and maybe even Lemmy count?

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I should have said with the exception of Lemmy. Not sure I’m getting enough value to continue using it either honestly.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      i am afraid that consensus among general population increasingly is “words mean exactly what you want them to mean at any given moment”. welcome to post-factual age.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah, language has always been in flux. We’re not going to become babbling morons any time soon. I mean, we even have writing now so we can save up a definition to adopt or reject later; that’s fairly new in human history.

        What is a bit different is that we have to talk about a lot of things that didn’t exist a generation ago, but that’s only a matter of quantity. Every branch of the Indo-European language family adopted it’s own term for iron when it arrived, for example, so I’m sure we’ll settle on some sort of consistent English terminology for different kinds of platforms. We’re just not there yet, as the replies I got show.

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yeah, no.

          the person who wrote “look at me, i am so cool, i am not using social networks” on a social network didn’t do that because they would be confused by new technology that didn’t exist generation ago, they did that because it worked for narrative they tried to present. and unfortunately it is more and more common and it is not a problem related to technology, just look at any political discussion.

          so while what you said is true, it is not very relevant to the discussed problem.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Social media has always excluded forum like sites. It most definitely does not include anonymous sites. Social media has a strict definition about having connections to people, none of which Reddit nor lemmy has. Reddit technically added followers, but you cannot see nor interact with them, that’s not social media, that’s an email list. If lemmy is social media then so are every single comment section on every news site ever.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Social media has always excluded forum like sites. Social media has a strict definition

        social media has never excluded anything. it wouldn’t even be possible, and that is because there is no supreme authority that could issue some strict definition that would be legally binding for everyone 😆

        • snowe@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          social media didn’t come about until after the advent of facebook so yes, by definition it excludes anything before then. Forum software existed for decades at that point. At no point in time has forum software ever been included in anyone’s social media definition, except it seems like you.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Social media has a strict definition social media didn’t come about until after the advent of facebook so yes, by definition it excludes anything before then.

            of course, sweetie. and just out of curiosity, what strict definition from some respectable authority other than you are you working with? 😂


            social media, n. Websites and applications which enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.


            social media, noun : forms of electronic communication (such as websites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (such as videos)



            long story short, social media is more than facebook.

            social media didn’t come about until after the advent of facebook so yes, by definition it excludes anything before then. Forum software existed for decades at that point.

            yes, they did. decades before facebook. you just said that. what you probably wanted to say is that the term didn’t come out until… well here is the news for you. the term usually comes after the phenomenon it is describing, not the other way around. it doesn’t work like “hey guys, i have cool term - social media - now we just have to invent some” 🤣

            anyone’s social media definition, except it seems like you

            nice projection there. have fun.