• tremble5218@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Amazon wasn’t caught doing shit. “Caught” implies there is a possibility of consequences. Two days from now nobody is going to remember this story and the world will move on and there will be no consequences for this.

    • derg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      “caught” also implies they’ve been hiding it… It’s been out in the open how they scan books to train AI for a while now.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I don’t think most people realize that the most efficient process for scanning books involves disassembling them.

        So of course they’re upset to hear the books are disposed of afterwards.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        It has been almost a trope that every time the discussion of them buying up the used market and cutting them up to scan, some apologist comes along and says that these books are mass produced garbage and not rare.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Especially since the articles make it clear that the AI companies don’t care about rarity or quality. It’s just a dragnet to get as many books as possible. Sure, a lot of the books are going to be garbage, but some of them are going to be valuable, too.

          The AI must be fed, and the only criterion is the book has to be published before 2022.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Whistle-blown?

      I wish there were any path for accountability anymore.

  • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can they at least provide all the scans to the public for free? It’s not like anyone is going to care if they violate copyright, that only applies to regular people.

    • irinotecan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Unfortunately, that would violate copyright law. In fact, the whole point of the destruction is to circumvent copyright, as apparently there was a ruling that scanning, tokenizing, and then destroying the original is transformative enough to be considered, “fair use.”

      • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        You are definitely right. It just sucks that destroying books is “fair use” while using movie clips to make a parody video gets taken down with little recourse.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You think they give a fuck? These people are going to get to the point where they would take aim at random people with rifles and shoot them for fun and then act like they did nothing wrong.

        Of course they would see an issue with that… If they are aiming themselves, it means they can be aimed at… So they will do it via drone.

    • RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s why they are scanning them and destroying them. Someone realized they can capitalize knowledge. We’re going to get the privilege of letting billionaires gate keep information and knowledge

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    They tracked the shipment to a site at a massive Amazon warehouse in Nevada, where workers say their job is to strip the spines off of books they receive so they can quickly scan their pages, destroying them in the process.

    So what they’re saying is, we should start making as many legit-looking books full of bullshit and gibberish as possible, then send them to Nevada where they can be used to help “train” their AI.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I stopped using Amazon like 8 years ago over various previous inhumane issues

    Seems the rest of the world prefers slightly more convenience

    What are you gonna do I guess

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      just remember. the planet is going to be just fine.

      1000004453

      remember how quickly wildlife came back when covid shutdowns hit? it’ll be like that when the last human dies.

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        The last human will be descendant of billionaires who’s lineage lived underground for 8 generations

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Great. The ants, cockroaches and rats will fight over world domination once we drove nearly everything else into extinction. That‘s so reassuring. I only ever cared about the ants anyway. /s

        I genuinely don‘t give a shit about the 99% of the planet that isn‘t it‘s outer crust so obviously I don‘t care if „the planet will be fine“ either. That‘s not mine or your world. Neither is anything that happens in millions of years after pretty much every species we ever knew is no longer there. It‘s such a straw man argument. Nobody is talking about what that clown was talking about when saying „the planet“ and he knew it.

    • Zephorah@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I ask people every now and then, the theme of the answer is similar: one stop shopping, it’s easier than looking elsewhere, answering with the question where else am I going to go? People tend to take the shortest path between A and B.

      There are some things you can only find there, sure, but there’s more of a shopping dopamine hit if you look around. Other retailers do exist. Most of the time you can find it elsewhere.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I do most of my shopping through eBay, although some of the sellers use Amazon for fulfillment. They’re hard to avoid entirely.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I miss electronics shops :( The chain and small hobby shops around me don’t carry things like resistors and capacitors. I checked every single one. Really.

      Then I bought a lifetime supply of resistors, like actual hundreds, and it was delivered to my doorstep in under 6 hours for $8.

    • traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just change one other mind. If everyone did the same they would be gone in no time. Do two and it will be done even sooner.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s like if Fahrenheit 451 had the firefighters meticulously remove the spines and digitize the books before burning them. Amazon is buying a single copy of these books, and destroying the books to make it faster to digitize. Just not at all book burning.

      You should be pissed about them using other peoples works to train their AI behemoth for profit. Not make a false equivalence to book burning…

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        that information is as good as gone if its in the hands of corporation while they destroy the original. also, you cant get the original info back from the training data, what they are doing is kind of like putting the information in a blender.

        and since they destroy the original books, no one else can have them. They also destroy piece of history since physical book is immutable while digital information can be tampered with. With rare books its possible they are destroying the last copy of the book, no way to know for sure.

        And i’m already beyond pissed that they use others work for profit. It has already been demonstrated that corporations are above any law, as long as they can manage their bribes and connections. You should trust corporations as much as you would a demon if demons were real.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Other AI companies can still buy them, they’re just rare because nobody bought them in the first place. They destroy them because scanning them is faster and in some jurisdictions that absolves you from copyright infringement since the amount of copies doesn’t go up

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’m just repeating what 404 media said on their July 21 podcast. They said that the first reports of AI book buyups were in Spain and the Netherlands, from rare book traders. The theory is that these AI companies are in a race to get the rare books first because they will be scanned and destroyed and they know that the widely circulated books will be available later

        Edit: and if you scan and destroy rare books then you have an advantage over the competition, another company can’t scan a book you’ve destroyed

    • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve been on Lemmy since 2023 and I’ve never seen this article. Not everybody is chronically online. Please don’t listen to this guy.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Repost spam kills forum discussion. If you missed this post you can see it in the 10 other places it was posted yesterday.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s what Lemmy is. Regurgitating the same story over and over again. For months.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      The answer to that question is obvious. They can do it 1000x faster cutting the spin and sending all the pages through a scanner. Otherwise you have to have something flip through every page and take a picture.

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The most ironic thing is that this is the only way that the current cultural metastasis appreciates rare knowledge. Which we once did!

    Like music it is the most fundamentally human endeavor and it has been destructively gamified. Thank fucking god for libraries, support yours!!!

  • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Where I draw the line for whether it is ethical to light things on fire is when they start destroying rare knowledge and books as fast as possible for no other reason than to hoard and obscure knowledge for private benefit.

    It is one thing to fund the creation of knowledge and then hoard it, it is entirely another to begin actively attacking and destroying pre-existing publicly shared resources of knowledge in the pursuit of monetizing access to that very knowledge behind a gargantuan profit motivated entity.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      They would only need a single copy of each book. They aren’t trying to get all possible copies to prevent others from getting them. They are trying to train their AI as quickly and cheaply as possible