GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’m just going to quote myself, as I’m satisfied enough with the answer I wrote to another reply.

    As it exists, as it was created, “AI” is evil. It consumes resources we can’t afford to waste and is currently supercharging our pollution indexes and creating what may be a catastrophic collapse of already very fragile and unbalanced social and economic realities. And because we are already into the sunken cost falacy fase, it will never be rewritten or rebuilt. Hopefully, it will collapse in such horrifying way it will create a cautionary tale, but we are not so lucky, so what we are left with is picking up the bits after it. This kind of system had to be developed inside laboratories, colleges, universities, research centers, to aid into very niche and specific fields of research, not made to be a mass consumption comodity as it is. But it was, unfortunately, not done that way.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      “I’m just going to quote myself”

      Yeah go on buddy, doesn’t make you right though.

      AI is an item (as “tool” seems to trigger you people), saying it is “evil” is just stupid and makes you sound like an evangelist lol.

      Is it bad? That is something people can actually discuss, but you’re not here for that it seems.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        The AI is a consummer of resources we can not easily dispense that returns nothing of objective and equivalent value.

        Fresh words, no quotes.

        More palatable now?

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          Oh no we didn’t know that!! /s

          Dude, we know the downsides of generative AI and the training of llms.

          Is that so hard to understand?

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            It is. It really is. At any point on any other endeavour, someone said it was enough and the costs did not justify the results. Not with this. So, it really is hard to understand.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Just because it was a nicely worded statement, doesn’t make it universal.

      I use a local LLM for our smart home. It wastes a Lil bit of energy, which is still faaaar below my 1500W while gaming. Is gaming evil now? It helps dramatically in ways that were never possible before like “turn on all lights at 40% in the color purple and also turn on music. My fav playlist” followed by a “no, use a warm color and close all windows”.

      Not every LLM is a fucking chatbot that eats the planet to “create” a shitty cat-meme for Granny’s Facebook.

      Don’t assume everyone uses silly chatbots. That is ONE application of LLMs, and it is indeed stupid and kills out environment for basically no benefit.