The IDF revealed on Friday, what it described as intelligence showing a Hamas command center located under a the Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. In a briefing, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari told members of the foreign press corps that there are areas in the hospitals that are used by Hamas to direct its military operations.

  • beaubbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if true, does it justify bombing and killing everyone in that hospital?

    • shadysus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the thing

      Hamas is awful for putting military installations near civilian infrastructure, and the Israeli military is awful for bombing indiscriminately despite their advanced military tech and resources.

      We don’t need to pick one or the other

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im not sure if i would blame Israel. If someone was barricaded next door to you taking people off the streets, taking pot shots over the fence and holding human shields you would want something done too. Unfortunately, while any action taken should miniseries danger to non-combatants they are literally in the line of fire.

        They tried blockades and cutting power, but everyone complained at that too. What are you meant to do when your opponent is deliberately trying to make you kill civilians to get rid of them?

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If only there were some middle ground between “doing nothing” and “leveling the entire building from orbit”. Perhaps something like sending in ground troops who can separate the terrorists from 6yo children.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, I support invasion - just been arguing in soo many places forgot to mention it here.

            But everyone seems to have an issue with ground assault too.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            So send in iserali troops that cam get killed while trying to clear the tunnels and who could also in the heat of battle shoot innocent people ?

            What dumb logic is that. You are just introducing more people that can die into the situation.

              • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well put.on your fatigues and go raid the hospital big boy. It’s really easy to be concerned about innocent lives when you don’t have to put yours on the line.

                I’ll keep the innocent soldiers safe and just bomb hamas

                • Floey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Love how soldiers are always innocent and victims are always terrorists.

                  • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I love how you go towards hamas being innocent and soldiers for Isreal bot being innocent.

                    Let’s face it, you just want more iseralies to get killed

        • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What should Hamas do? Put their bases out in the open and announce where they are? They would be blown up within minutes.

          • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So pragmatism for palestine but israel must be held accountable to the highest standards?? This is why I cannot understand hamas apologists.

        • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Take precautions and don’t indiscriminately bomb civilian population creating the next generation of people that will fight you.

          You know what would keep you from killing civilians?

          A ceasefire.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean like every other ceasefire that was “agreed” in history that never lasted, had another attack and started all over again.

            Those ceasefire?

            • ClockNimble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, those ceasefires! The ones that let non-combatants escape, aid to reach the dead and dying, humanitarian efforts to make headway even if only for a short time.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                non combatants escape - Hamas is deliberately holding civilians where they can act as shields. They aren’t letting their only protection go.

                Aid to reach dying - Hamas is taking it and holding it, it won’t reach those in need. Any aid that crosses will end up in the hands of those who want to prolong the conflict.

                Humanitarian efforts to make headway - im not holding hope for any meaningful headway without coming under attack or theft, and would not be surprised if Hamas took aid workers as hostages.

                I want you to be correct, but none of the history tells me that any civilians will benefit while Hamas is there and foreign (not necessarily Israeli) forces are not there to make it happen.

                • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  ~40k Hamas fighters in Gaza can’t hold the other 99.9% non combatants population hostage. This is an excuse to lump all Palestinians in with the Hamas fighters.

                  Flour was allowed in to feed the people then one of the only remaining bakeries in Gaza was bombed. What is that but an attempt to starve the people of Gaza. Again maybe 1 in 1000 people is Hamas so 999 people have to starve to cut off Hamas?

                  How about Westbank, where there is no Hamas. Why are they bombing Palestinians in the Westbank if this is all about Hamas and taking them out?

                  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You clearly don’t understand group think and herd mentality. Have you ever ignored someone with an assault rifle, or your government, or seen how small groups can control larger ones? Less than 10% of Germany were a part of the nazi party but they had the control of government and the population. America just had one gunman shut down an entire city, and they didn’t control the hospitals, utilities or police.

                    My maths may be off, but you are also looking at 40k combatants in a 20 sqkm area. You are welcome to argue with one of them.

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      By the rules of war? Yes, absolutely. You could even make an argument that the Geneva Convention would encourage the bombing of this hospital as a way to deter future actors from attempting a similar war crime.