If you use out of scientific context psychological terms as a substitute for meaningful political analysis, it’s because you’ve got nothing else. I highly recommend this essay on “psychopolitics”
Weird how you armchair-psychoanalyze me to prove your point that my armchair-psychoanalysis of Putin being a megalomaniac is incorrect, but okay. Would you take my point if instead of “megalomaniac” I used the term “irredentist fuckwad” or simply just “tosser”?
Expanding energy into arguing with idiots is wasted energy. My initial mistake was posting in .ml (didn’t check). I will filter out your community in order to prevent any future mishaps. Apologies.
If you use out of scientific context psychological terms as a substitute for meaningful political analysis, it’s because you’ve got nothing else. I highly recommend this essay on “psychopolitics”
Weird how you armchair-psychoanalyze me to prove your point that my armchair-psychoanalysis of Putin being a megalomaniac is incorrect, but okay. Would you take my point if instead of “megalomaniac” I used the term “irredentist fuckwad” or simply just “tosser”?
“You got nothing else” is just a factual observation. Your new comment is further evidence of this.
Expanding energy into arguing with idiots is wasted energy. My initial mistake was posting in .ml (didn’t check). I will filter out your community in order to prevent any future mishaps. Apologies.
Bury your head in the sand, little one.
You could have just said “OK you’re right” btw.