• XTornado@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But that’s still confusing because we already can. Yeah you might need a little bit more of hardware but… not that crazy. Plus some simpler models can be run with more normal hardware.

    Might not be easy to setup that is true.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I personally use runpod. It doesn’t cost much even for the high end level stuff. Tbh the openai API is easier though and gives mostly better results.

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I specifically said “large context” how many tokens can you get through before it goes insanely slow?

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Max token windows are 4k for llama 2 tho there’s some fine tunes that push the context up further. Speed is limited by your budget mostly, you can stack GPUs and there are most models available (including the really expensive ones)

            I’m just letting you know, If you want something easy, just use ChatGtp. I don’t find them overly expensive for what it is.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          nice to see! i’m not following the scene as much anymore (last time i played around with it was with wizard mega 30b). definitely a big improvement, but as much as i hate to do this, i’ll stick to chatgpt for the time being, it’s just better on more niche questions and just does some things plain better (gpt4 can do maths (mostly) without hallucinating)