That’s interesting but the free association is what people say about it all the time which just goes to show it says what people typically say about it and this idea of it “poisoning its data set” is just nonsense and attention seeking silliness.
Sure. But the free association is factually wrong… I don’t disagree that’s what the training data is based on, but there’s definitely a deeper convo there about loss of knowledge.
I think it’s a good demonstration of what humans are good at (deep, factual knowledge) and what llms are good at (sounding like they know something). It just has nothing to do with breaking the system
That’s interesting but the free association is what people say about it all the time which just goes to show it says what people typically say about it and this idea of it “poisoning its data set” is just nonsense and attention seeking silliness.
Sure. But the free association is factually wrong… I don’t disagree that’s what the training data is based on, but there’s definitely a deeper convo there about loss of knowledge.
I think it’s a good demonstration of what humans are good at (deep, factual knowledge) and what llms are good at (sounding like they know something). It just has nothing to do with breaking the system
Oh, fair enough. I wasn’t trying to suggest the system is near breaking. Just giving context as in comment #1.