• nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      Everything is a tradeoff. At this point there are more valuable things to be spending money on than making chargers that are as fast as possible. Not all cars can charge at 500+kWhs many cannot even do 100kWhs. IMO better to spend money upgrading all the slow 7-50kWh chargers. As well as putting in more slow charging near residents. Kerb charging for people that dont have a driveway in cities or chargers for those living in flats. That would serve people better then spending more money on something very few can actually benefit from.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      but the fast chargers do need more infrastructure that takes more space and cost, when having MORE slower, cheaper, easier to install AC chargers everywhere will help just as much

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      BYD did a 1.5MW and Geely did a 2.2MW charging now, but they faced the one big issue with such charging speed : building a facility for it. It requires a tremendous amount of power so it cannot pull only from the grid, so it can’t be deployed in most place. That’s the challenge they’re facing, and even Geely said the speed has peaked. Practically there’s no need to have those charging speed, more charger is much more beneficial than super fast charging.