• mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago
    • The US military heard it and didn’t necessarily want to give away capability of listening devices around the sea floor.

    • The sub was difficult to get to the debris field because it was at an incredibly deep section that few craft are capable of reaching safely.

    It was frustrating they made a big deal about something we ultimately could have done nothing about in the first place. However it’s not like the whole “hearing the implosion” thing was something the military wanted to give away and at that depth we have to be careful. Don’t forget we’ve put more people into space than have been to the deepest point on the planet.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      So why did they reveal that info after if it was so sensitive? I wouldn’t have thought that would have changed anything. I also have vague memories of reports of a “sound” being detected early on but then not mentioned again until after. Then again my memory is trash so I dunno

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      No. They heard it at the surface. You hear the equivalent of hundreds of pounds of explosives going off within a few thousand feet. It probably even vibrated the boat a bit.

      It was the equivalent of a massive depth charge. They heard it at the surface near by unless the entire crew was sound asleep.

  • linux2647@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    11 months ago

    Definitely thought this was talking about a subreddit and I got real confused there for a minute 😅

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It isn’t? I’m still confused what else a “sub” could be in this context…

      Edit: after reading more it’s “submarine”, I’ve spent way too much time on Reddit.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        A submarine. You remember the rich maniac who wanted to see the titanic wreck and didn’t apply to any safety regulations since it’s international water

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    What I want to know about that accident is, which idiot kept spreading the lie that the search teams were hearing “banging noises” every half hour, long after the sub had imploded.

  • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Remember when there was a boat full of migrants that sank around the same time and nobody in power gave half a shit about it even though it would’ve been way easier to locate and rescue those people?

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They weren’t searching anywhere at all, because they didn’t have a suitable submersible available. They were looking on the surface in case they popped up, but once the remote submersible got there, they went straight down to the wreck.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, Im still wondering if they ever had definitive results from their investigation of the wreckage.