I was originally going to ask how many legal genders there should be, but I fail to see a compelling argument against 0.

  • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Women are excluded from medical studies and even medicines designed for women are trialed on men, anyway, so I would argue it wouldn’t make a difference medically, anyway.

    • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t, due to biological differences in sex. I mean, not that I wouldn’t take drugs designed for women, but if you’re hemorrhaging blood or have a problem where certain medicines present contraindications with your biology, you’d want a doctor to know.

    • riverdoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Primary care physicians need to know what conditions you might be susceptible to in the future, and some of these conditions are based on your sex.