The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to consider whether Congress had the constitutional authority to impose a ban on distilling spirits in private homes more than 150 years ago.

Plaintiffs challenging the prohibition on home distilling claim the 1868 law is an antiquated relic of Reconstruction-era politics. They argue that Congress overstepped its taxation powers when it enacted the home distilling ban as part of a tax reform measure designed to curb fraud by commercial distillers.

Government attorneys counter that Congress properly restricted where spirits can be distilled to prevent producers from evading federal excise taxes. They warn that lifting the ban would violate Supreme Court precedent and erode congressional powers.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The libertarian in me says fuck yes, if you wanna make booze, go make booze, fuck the monopolized spirits industry. The 2026 realist in me is trying to figure out how this turns into a big juicy bone for the existing entrenched industry players.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I also think about all the folks I know and who would try to distil liquor vs who is smart enough to do it right. Honestly this feels like thing that should be local laws. I feel its a bit like guns. The higher the density the more likely you want to restrict it or at least permit it.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          60 minutes ago

          I don’t think they don’t do it because its illegal as much as because its not convenient enough. If there was something like head shops for brewing and distillation I could see them giving it a try.

  • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hmm.

    Methanol poisoning rates are probably gonna go up. As are house explosions.

    Should be fun!

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s several other countries with a thriving legal home distillation scene, New Zealand being one of the more commonly referenced ones, that disprove the danger.

      Ethanol is actually a treatment option for methanol poisoning, plus the amount of methanol is quite low in fermented grain and fruit alcohols to begin with and, despite what people believe, is not concentrated in the heads so even forgetting to remove the heads doesn’t increase the risk of methanol poisoning.

      The amount of ethanol vapor in air is also quite low. Many hobby distillation sets also use immersed electric heating elements as they’re way more efficient so igniting ethanol vapor is less risk than you might think.

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, you can also distill using pressure swings entirely to be completely safe.

        My neighbor is a licensed gunsmith and gun dealer. He still gets drunk, forgets which guns are loaded, and puts new holes in his walls every few months.

        Something tells me that the people most excited about the prospect might have a “safety third” mindset.

        Overall, I’m not against getting rid of the ban, even a fairly large still explosion probably won’t take out more than the distiller/their family, and I’m smart enough to not buy sketchy Bob’s moonshine. It does mean I get to play a bit more without breaking any laws.

    • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Was just gonna say, those stories you read every few years about 50+ people dying from improperly distilled alcohol in Kenya are coming to a town near you.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Our country’s founders would be rolling over in their graves to learn that a pastime in which even George Washington partook, which is as American as apple pie and certainly a lot older, has quite absurdly been turned into a federal crime,” Alt said in a statement.

    Yeah, Washington never partook whatsoever in any pastimes which have been rightfully turned into federal crimes. No siree. Not one single thing.

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t know how popular this is but I would love them to relax the rules on home distillation. There are public safety issues with home distillation but there are lots of things you can do at home that are dangerous and there’s way more safety info and better tools available these days. I just wanna make my own booze!

    • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For all ya’ll disliking this, I can buy chemicals off ebay where a whiff can give you super cancer, i can own large construction equipment without permits and use it as long as its on my own property. I think distilling alcohol is fine

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And most of the safety concerns of home distillation are way overblown to boot. The person likely to actually cause a fire distilling at home I guarantee is the kind of person splashing large jugs of white spirits from the hardware store everywhere near open flames or dropping icy turkey in a vat of oil and is already gonna start a fire somehow.