• alexyeahdude@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that Linus is a superhero, but it’s still so weird to me that this vital piece of the world’s infrastructure relies on one man.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      152
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think its better to think of it like a president or prime minister. He might set the plan and direction and making the big decisions, but there are thousands of others supporting and making the plan actually happen.

      In the past he has delegated the release to others as well.

      So if the worst would happen, the linux project would continue operating fairly seamlessly.

    • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also mind blowing to consider that as many other projects, both Linux and Python started as a hobyist project never meant to do more than cater to some personal needs.

      This taught me how important is allocating time for your team for their personal projects, as the next school romance anime tagging system could be the cornerstone of every AI in the future.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        95
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except 99.999% of personal projects won’t be that popular and allocating time for personal projects is a waste in that regard. Basically you’d be playing lottery and not get anything out of it.

        There’s plenty of reasons to encourage personal projects, but this isn’t one of them.

        • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was just joking but I’m glad you took it at face value and replied.

          Please have a wonderful day, and an even better weekend.

        • uberkalden@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          58
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, downvote this guy for pointing out that it might not make sense for your company to pay for your personal projects

          • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            46
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe because it’s a wise investment to encourage knowledge workers gain additional experience working on things they enjoy even if you might not be able to pick up one of those things and directly make another revenue stream out of it.

          • hibsen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t, but I get why. It’s a specious argument — it doesn’t matter if 99% of them are useless. It matters if the 1% that become ubiquitous for whatever reason provide utility that makes the useless ones worth it.

            Yeah you can run a company that never provides any time or resources to tinker, but only if you’re okay with innovation never happening again.

    • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s because it doesn’t : ) He is the top level engineer/manager for releases and technical consultation but there are many more engineers “under” him leading and moving the pieces into place.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux is developed by a ton of people. As soon as Linus is out of the picture (say, because he retires), someone else will take his place.

      Apple didn’t disappear just because Steve Jobs was gone.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know I shouldn’t put too much weight onto what the numbers actually mean, but it’s still weird to think we’re only on version 6 after all this time.

  • REdOG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Im happy that I’ll live through kernel of the beast times

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “So this last week has been pretty calm, and I have absolutely no excuses to delay the v6.6 release any more, so here it is,” Torvalds wrote early on Monday morning, as version 6.6 debuted as planned.

    Among the highlights of the release are the KSMBD in-kernel server for the SMB networking protocol, which adds additional features for sharing files and improving inter-process communication in Linux, hopefully speeding I/O.

    Speaking of AMD, early tests by the Linux-lovers at Phoronix found substantial performance gains for its manycore “Bergamo” CPUs thanks to the inclusion of the Earliest Eligible Virtual Deadline First (EEVDF) scheduler.

    The kernel also added support for AMD’s Dynamic Boost Control tech that allows users to tune Ryzen CPUs for optimal performance.

    A change to this cut of the kernel rebrands it as just “SELinux” – a reaction to the Agency’s role in ops that have harmed privacy, per Edward Snowden.

    US-based contributors will also have a Thanksgiving-sized hole kicked in their schedules, making it possible work on this release will be slow and Torvalds could push it into early 2024.


    The original article contains 506 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!