• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I think the distinction is what we consider “the work of a man”. I don’t consider man’s work to be just physical labor. A lot of things can do that. I think the true work of humanity is to use our ingenuity and critical thinking to do more. I’m not saying physical labor is not important, but there are several jobs that require physical labor and take thought and troubleshooting. I don’t need a human being to screw in the same screw on an assembly line a hundred times a day, but a human being may be needed to determine why that screw ends up being a failure point in the final product.

    There is of course lots to be said about the value of a hard days work and the toil and effort of physical labor, but I think we are all capable of so much more. It need not just be that.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t consider man’s work to be just physical labor.

      The key here is that the English language currently does a piss-poor job of creating a destinction between meaningfull, avocational, enriching “work”, and meaningless, necessity-driven “labour.” Anthropologists have found pre-agrarian cultures tended to do far less labour, but had plenty of activity. I blame pretestant “work ethic” for equating taking out the trash and all that with meaningful work that makes a person.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I get the reference, but that’s not really related to what I said. I don’t want to just ignore your comment if it’s a serious point, but at no point did I suggest otherwise.

        • mriormro@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I was being a little tongue-in-cheek.

          I just don’t super agree with your premise that the “real” work of man is to do more, is all. I like to think it’s more to accomplish something with intention, craft, and rigor. We’ve disconnected ourselves from our “real” work.

          • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            My verbiage may differ slightly from yours, but I believe we agree. “Intention, craft” would indicate something similar to ingenuity to me. Obviously, totally OK for you to disagree, or think I did not explain appropriately, but my point was that we are not just beasts of burden, we can think and analyze and have opinions therefore allowing us to do things with “Intention” and to not just create things but to “craft” them.