• mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At this point, why do they care about predicting crime? Can’t they just say “everyone is guilty, unless they are friends in business relationship with us.”

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because we know what predicts crime. Wealth inequality, unemployment and job insecurity, bad education, healthcare and especially mental health, segregation, that kind of thing. But by painting over it with AI with the right training data it can be blamed on personal responsibility and nothing to do with societal structural issues, so certain rich folks kan keep getting more rich.

      • mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        “it can be blamed on personal responsibility” so, this equals to “magic box says you are a bad person”, at which point the magic box could just be a single “are we in business relationship with this person, yes or no?” decision. This was my point. You don’t need complicated machinery if you know what results you want out of it.

        In the past the magic box was called God, or nation or clan, now it is called AI. There’s always a puppeteer behind the box, so why bother actually wasting resources on the internals of the box.

        • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Because these people want to avoid an “are we the baddies” moment, so a nice elaborate magic box full of plausible deniability is prefered. Everybody wants to be the hero in their own story and the fancier the story the better.