Google announced Tuesday that early next year it would turn off artificial intelligence tools in its popular software for K-12 students, unless school administrators explicitly choose to make such tools available. Executives at the tech giant said they wanted to be responsive to educators and parents who have asked for more control in how children interact with A.I. But there is a catch: Schools that choose to restrict A.I. entirely will also lose access to Google search.

A.I. features are now a standard part of Google’s commercially available search engine. “Search and A.I. are deeply integrated,” said Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google. If a school has banned A.I., he added, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.” Google is by far the dominant technology player in K-12 classrooms. Google’s suite of education apps — including Gmail, Docs and an assignment platform called Classroom — is ubiquitous. Google Chromebooks, low-cost laptops, are the most widely issued student devices in U.S. schools. And Google is synonymous with internet search, a crucial tool for students across the globe.

The company’s new strategy underscores Google’s powerful role in American education. If school leaders want continued student access to search within the company’s ecosystem, they will be forced to embrace Google’s A.I. In recent months, Google has been promoting its Gemini chatbot as a valuable educational tool, saying it can aid teachers in planning lessons and serve as a personalized tutor for students. A new student version of Gemini, Guided Learning, is supposed to make it harder for students to use A.I. to cheat.

“We’re evolving our approach,” said Mr. Phillips. He promised tools that would “support the productive struggle” of learning and tamp down on students turning to A.I. for easy answers. In August, Google turned on A.I. features as the default option inside its Classroom app for K-12 schools that had allowed students separate access to the company’s Gemini chatbot. The move upset some school leaders, who felt schools should be able to decide how and when students used Google’s A.I.

Google’s August change will now be reversed.

A parent movement has been pushing back against the use of A.I. in schools, and against screen time more generally. While A.I. chatbots can be useful tools for research and coding, they can also easily be used to cheat on school assignments and can provide false information. Research shows chatbots can also hinder critical thinking and ensnare adolescents in emotional dependency.

Last week, New York State passed a chatbot safety law that would prohibit companies from providing a variety of A.I. features for minors. And in September, the nation’s two largest school districts, in New York City and Los Angeles — both Google clients — broadly restricted student access to generative artificial intelligence on school devices. Officials in the Los Angeles Unified School District said at the time that they were hoping students would be able to conduct Google searches with A.I. overviews turned off. The overviews are A.I.-generated summaries that appear at the top of searches. They can dissuade students from seeking out multiple sources of information. On Monday, Google executives said that for districts that choose to allow A.I., there will be two options for search inside school-issued accounts, beginning in early 2027. One option will be search with A.I. overviews and A.I. chats turned on, similar to the current consumer experience. The other will be search using Guided Learning, the student version of Google’s Gemini chatbot.

Guided Learning is intended to guide students through a topic step-by-step without providing them with answers that could short-circuit learning. It is supposed to offer an experience modeled on one-to-one tutoring.

The consumer version of Guided Learning is already available within Gemini, and can enable cheating. In a reporter’s test, it produced a detailed essay in response to an Advanced Placement history prompt.

There are greater restrictions in the school version that is currently being piloted, according to Brit Mennuti, product lead for Google Classroom. She said teachers would be able to review students’ chatbot transcripts, among other capabilities.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Member when software companies offered ultra cheap student licenses because they recognized the long term value of a student learning and getting accustomed to their program? I member.

      This seems very, very shortsighted.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Exactly this! Imagine a whole generation associating search with DDG or Kagi? That would really move the needle in the future regarding tech adoption to alternative platforms

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Student discounted software started when most of the corporate world was still using typewriters and paper. Students learned the new-fangled software and carried into their new jobs.

        Today, those same businesses rely on Microsoft Office and Google search, and those monopolies are obviously going to leverage their monopolies to force AI, Teams, or whatever other Next Big Thing onto unwilling schools.

      • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        But Google needs the return on AI right now! Those kids are just products that produced data to be sold.

  • o8bepbua9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m sure it’s a tactic to make the schools allow AI, but I hope they can resist. Google does not need a stranglehold on every person in every market. Google search has gotten worse anyway, so even duck duck go would be fine. Maybe even use this as an opportunity to teach kids about data privacy.

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Might also be an attempt to keep their Search numbers up. I saw an article recently that AI is hurting Google Search because of the lack of click through due to AI summaries.

      By packaging them together they get to boost both options through a semi-captive audience.

  • Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Sure, Google is evil, etc. But the school admin can default omnibar search to another search engine. Like noai.duckduckgo. com.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sounds like a win win. They don’t have to use ai if they choose not to, and they also get incentivized to explore switching to other search engines

  • Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Those chromebooks are a smoking deal aren’t they school systems, we told you in countless meetings, emails, and snail mail this was a bad idea.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You okay with increasing school budgets? That seem to be a hard sell for America, for instance.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I’m an American and literally just voted yes to increase my taxes to improve local schools. Sure there’s red chunks who don’t understand but the country is not this monoculture people keep making it out to be

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Isn’t this the logic that lead to Chromebooks and the illiteracy crisis?

        Sure, take this heavily discounted tech for your digital native kids. Just make sure they use only our software, never learn what files are, never have access to the terminal where they might customize their system, and we have all their data.

        I was taught if something seems too good to be true it isn’t, and also there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Might be nice for a certain age group to make them evaluate multiple search engines as a class project. (“If it provided a summary, did it say what its sources were?” “When you checked the sources, did they actually say what the summary said they said?” “How many actual results did it return for these searches?” “How many of the results on the first page were useful?” etc.) Improved media literacy in general, and they all learn that more than one search engine exists.