• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Definitely not. Look at the short video in the article, and imagine there are dozens of those things, which will inevitably happen if this kind of thing ramps up, which is surely what the corporation who’s running these things wants. There would be no way to safely walk down the sidewalk, and people would be forced to walk in the street to get around them.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, fuck those people with movement disorders and their spinal and neurological disabilities, they should get back in the hospital bed where they belong. /s

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair if there are dozens of these things on the sidewalk then that means traffic is much better and the road can be cannibalized to increase the area available. Assuming the government acts fairly and promptly (hah, as if), this is a win for everyone involved.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        if there are dozens of these things on the sidewalk then that means traffic is much better

        That’s a stretch. There could still be plenty of car traffic while still having sidewalks filled with bots

        • madkins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m guessing because one of these means a 5-8 passenger internal combustion vehicle is not on the roads, but we all know pedestrians will never get that real estate back.