I Cast Fist@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWhich language you wish would really grow and reach mainstream adoption?message-squaremessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1114arrow-down1message-squareWhich language you wish would really grow and reach mainstream adoption?I Cast Fist@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square99fedilinkfile-text
Assume mainstream adoption as used by around 7% of all github projects Personally, I’d like to see Nim get that growth.
minus-squareloics2@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·1 year agoElixir… please I want an Elixir job
minus-squareTQuid@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe most beautiful language. Why doesn’t every language have pipes?
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago Why doesn’t every language have pipes? Mario’s favorite character
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI find Universal Function Call Syntax a much nicer solution than pipes, although I don’t think it’s quite as broad. For example, taking the example from elixir’s home page: "Elixir" |> String.graphemes() |> Enum.frequencies() would be "Elixir".graphemes.frequences in something like D
minus-squareflakpanzer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoElixir is such a beautifully designed language, my favorite language BY FAR. (I want an Elixir job too 🥹 )
Elixir… please I want an Elixir job
The most beautiful language. Why doesn’t every language have pipes?
Mario’s favorite character
I find Universal Function Call Syntax a much nicer solution than pipes, although I don’t think it’s quite as broad.
For example, taking the example from elixir’s home page:
would be
"Elixir".graphemes.frequences
in something like D
Elixir is such a beautifully designed language, my favorite language BY FAR.
(I want an Elixir job too 🥹 )