• Keith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone who uses root (not at the moment but plans to) as I believe in owning my devices, fully, this is horrible. We still need to oppose this.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I know right? The article touches on this:

      Google said the inspiration for the original Web Integrity project was Android’s Play Integrity API, which already scans your phone for root privileges and denies access to things

      ^^^ this should have never, ever been a thing!

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        That is just standard and a completely sensible security measure for preventing people from tampering with an application. It cannot replace proper, server-side security measures but is a big step. Especially for stuff like banking applications.

        • BaldDude@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I never really understood that:

          If I’m using my browser to do banking via the website, Having root privileges and tampering with the Browser running the applications is not an issue.

          If i use the banking app, Having root privileges suddenly become a problem.

          –> To me, it doesn’t look like the problem is technical, but that users are accepting things on mobile that they wouldn’t accept on a PC.