User accounts are fragmented and just because you signed on at lemmy.world doesn’t mean your account exists on lemmy.ca.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1985

Communities are fragmented and /c/games on lemmy.world is completely different than the one on lemmy.ml with its own users, set of posts, etc.

Lemmy does not currently allow for instance or user migration.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3057

Nor does it allow for shared communities (ie the aforementioned /c/games is unified across multiple instances)

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3100

We are in the early days. If you’re eager feel free to join in the development on these any many other core issues. There’s real potential here.

  • JorMaFur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    BUT you can still upvote or comment on posts from different instances if you access them from within the instance your account is from!

    So you don’t need to create one account for each instance.

    Edit: commented from a lemm.ee account

    • JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a very important note, and I am afraid this post will confuse people. Yes, there are multiple c/games, but you can follow all of them from any of the accounts and comment, post and otherwise interact as long as your instances are federated.

      • everythingsucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It definitely confused me. I’m used to reddit so the idea that I would have to have multiple accounts was a huge downside. Thanks for clearing it up… At least a littl.

      • 2bR02b@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The post clearly mentions “c/games on lemmy.world”, not just “c/games”. Cut them some slack.

    • neal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly - as long as the instance isnt defederated, you should be able to post/comment/upvote/mod in communities that are outside of your home instance.

        • Archerofyail@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you’re looking at subscribed or All they do, but the local feed is the default, and that only shows stuff on the local instance, in this case lemmy.world.

          If you mean your profile, that will show all your activity on every instance.

        • TimeIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can choose to show “Subscribed” communities—only the ones you’ve chosen, “Local” communities—only the ones on Lemmy.World, or “All”—which will pull from all the communities federated with Lemmy.World.

          So to answer the question, posts from outside your home instance will show up in your feed, should you choose for them to.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can browse by “all” instances, or “local” your instance. Some people say “all” has this complicated formula that it shows what your instances users subscribe to, not a true all. I have no idea.

    • itadakimasu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I swear upvote counts are isolated to individual instances too. I don’t think they are supposed to be… But one post on Lemmy.world viewed from Lemmy.world shows hundreds of upvotes, but on another smaller instance it shows 5 upvotes.

      I hope that’s not the way Lemmy is intended to work.

      It makes no sense at all

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is badly written - to someone who doesn’t know any of this it reads like they’re missing out on something. Yes there’s !games@lemmy.world and !games@lemmy.ml - but you don’t need an account on either to participate in both! You can just go there and browse, comment, etc.

    Eventually one will become dominant, and it will all be fine.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      One becomes dominant which is then tied to an instance and there goes your federation you’re all clamouring about. Man I’m enjoying Lemmy so far but Jesus there’s a lot of you need pulling your heads out your asses. It’s a cool platform and a cool idea but damn there’s a lot of core issues that need addressing.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        One community will be become dominant. It’s just the way things go. And it’s better for the user - why would we want discussions for some particular topic fragmented? It’s early days so some communities have competitors but one will be slightly bigger, more people will gravitate towards that, and the effect will compound.

        As for federation yes a community is owned by an instance, sometimes a big instance.

        But there’s no reason we wouldn’t have communities across a variety of instances. We already do. Most are on big instances sure since they have most users who create most communities, but there’s several larger communities on smaller instances. Like !houseplants@mander.xyz or !startrek@startrek.website

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The benefit of federation isn’t that no community becomes dominant for it’s field, it’s that there is no central authority. It’s open source, so if a change is accepted that makes apps pay a ton for API access (random example), a fork can be made to roll back that change and servers can switch to the fork. It also means that if one server goes down, the rest doesn’t go with it, or one wild admin can’t destroy everything.

        If one server becomes dominant for one thing and they fuck it up eventually, a new community can be created. This isnt a feature of federation though. The same thing can (and did) happen on Reddit. There are huge benefits to federation, but that isn’t one. Segregation of communities also isn’t one.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imho a better option, which I’m sure if Lemmy is successful will get there, is a central app but with a public codebase and a federated ownership. A central platform owned by the people for the people.

  • Altair@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Isn’t that the whole point though? Not relying on a single entity by spreading out, but still being connected?

    Fragmentation would be fixed by just integrating lemmyverse.net’s functionality into lemmy itself (like in this github issue), allowing users to see the true user count/activity of comms and incentivise them to join the most popular one.

    Needs to be done asap imo; comm discoverability is not good right now and is probably the single biggest hurdle for new users

    • whoisearth@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone want to be the scrum master for them? Lol. Looks like they need a sprint planning session!

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it doesn’t matter much except when you wanna view several communities on the same topic. I’d like to be able to see all the 3dprinting communities at once.

      • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then just subscribe to all of them

        We do need a “multi-community” feature where we can view a bunch of similar subs in the same feed, however

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I see multiple communities on the same subject, I just subscribe to all of them. Either they’ll eventually differentiate into their own unique spaces, or one of them will become the dominant one and the others will become fringe alternates. It’s a good thing.

  • gunslingerfry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok so I’m looking at a post to You Should Know. When I look at the community info it says “You Should Know.” The only way I know it’s on lemmy.world is because it says you need to adhere to lemmy.world policies. I see nothing in the app (Jerboa) that indicates which instance it’s on. What am I missing? If I am subscribed to a bunch of communities called “Games” how do I know which post comes from which community?

    • Kftrendy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this an app-specific issue? I’m using wefwef on iOS and it shows “youshouldknow@lemmy.world” as the community. It doesn’t show it for the user, though, which is another worthwhile piece of information.

      • fantasia@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m on Jerboa and it does indicate as you quoted. I don’t know why the guy said that way. Maybe lemmy.world is his home instance.

    • davitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is definitely a gap on the main community pages, but in the interim, if you click into an actual post it shows the fully qualified community name at the top. At least that’s what I’m seeing.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy does not currently allow for instance or user migration.

    This should probably be high up on the list of additions. I like the idea of Lemmy but for things like getting support no one is going to use Lemmy if the entire community and all the posts can just disappear one day and all the history go poof.

    • Altair@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instance migration, lemmyverse.net functionality in lemmy, and assigning new users to a good random instance upon registration (and letting them change it of course) so they don’t need to know about instances, are the three most important features lemmy needs rn imo

  • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    As other commenters have mentioned, this is technically true but pretty misleading. This is viewing the fediverse through an inappropriate lens.

    Your account technically doesn’t exist on other instances but it effectively doesn’t matter.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Devil’s advocate but what if someone registers whoisearth on another instance and starts spewing vitreol? I’m sure many people would be concerned about any online reputation they’ve built then get cut down simply because someone wants to be an asshole. How would that scenario play out? Genuinely curious.

      • jorge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what if someone registers whoisearth on Gmail, Outlook, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn or PornHub? Have you registered your name on literally every social media ever existed? This isn’t a new problem, or one that is created by the concept of federation.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As you are well aware you are giving examples of multiple different platforms not one single platform. Way to compare apples to oranges.

          And before you try, this is not multiple platforms. It’s multiple federated instances of the same platform.

  • Naloxone@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like Lemmy a lot so far, and I’ve brought along a couple of friends… I do have a couple of questions though!

    What happens if the server I’m on goes down for an extended period of time, or forever? Is my account data just gone? Or is that mirrored somewhere else?

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s gone. Portability is ostensibly a core goal of fediverse development, so I would assume we’ll see it arrive in code form fairly soon.

    • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if that happened to me. I signed up a few weeks ago, but my account disappeared somewhere in the Lemmy ether. I made this new account the other day. Hope this one sticks…

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need a more unified login experience. OIDC/Oauth would work wonders for this.

    1. User registers at X lemmy/mastadon/peertube instance (activitypub app, [APA]) and gets malloc@lemmy.xyz
    2. Users visits Y APA
    3. Logins to Y APA using X user
    4. User redirected to X APA instance to login (knows user registered at lemmy.xyz)
    5. Upon successful login, user returned to Y APA

    User now able to browse/post/comment in Y APA without having to manually go through original APA app where user account lives.

    Basically each APA acts as its own IdP (identity provider); and would go a long way in improving user experience and reducing frustration.

    If you are not familiar with this flow, then look at any web service with a login. They are usually accompanied by a Google/Apple/Facebook login option; and that’s that we are trying to replicate here. One set of credentials across the entire fediverse.

    • Syboxez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this would have to start off as some kind of defined standard in ActivityPub before it could be implemented across all ActivityPub services and be interoperable.

      Otherwise, it will result in fragmentation.

      But yeah, having one ActivityPub account for many services is ideal IMO, along with being able to follow any content on your platform of choice (like interacting with Peertube or Mastodon postings in Lemmy, or even something rediculous like interacting with Lemmy posts in PeerTube)

  • _MoveSwiftly@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hello there, and welcome to our community! I hope you like it in here.

    Could you please include some body text as to why should people know this, and how would that help them? It’s our second rule. Thank you :)