I’m currently playing Diablo IV (and having a blast with it) but finding one small gripe which I only think is going to get worse and probably stop me playing it completely in the long run.

My girlfriend is currently pregnant. This means in 6 months time we’ll have a newborn. With this in mind I’m expecting to only be able to grab a few minutes at a time to game and even when I think I’ll have longer I may end up jumping off at short notice. This means I’ll almost certainly come to rely on games which I can pause. Unfortunately this isn’t possible with Diablo IV since it requires an always online connection even though I’m essentially playing it as a single player game.

What are other people’s thoughts?

  • Azabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the game is single player, there’s no reason for it to force you to be connected to the internet. It’s annoying and it shouldn’t be the norm

  • AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Such a bad idea.

    Internet goes? Can’t play

    Power goes? Can’t play

    Travelling? Can’t play

    Servers go down? Can’t play

    Servers are shutdown? Can’t play

    Not being able to pause a single player games is so silly, its such a good feature especially for situations like yours.

    I pirate any single player games that require always online and its just a better experience, the game doesn’t pause when the internet goes and I don’t have to worry about servers being shutdown

    I’m sure Blizzard and EA are looking at the way Netflix is forcing its users to only watch content in their own household and dying to implement that into their games too

  • Reeek@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly fuck always online games. Piracy prevention methods at the cost of the paying customer. Absolute ridiculous that you cant play things you own offline

  • YuzuDrink@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went through the same phase several years back when my child was born, and you’re right—games where you can pause any time are the only kind worth playing for several years after a new child.

  • loops@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    it requires an always online connection even though I’m essentially playing it as a single player game.

    That is awful. What are their reasons for that?

    • Deestan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It prevents the most obvious cheating like savegame editing, save scum item duplication, and similar. If the game has PvP, an item shop or leaderboards while still allowing your game character to be taken online when you feel like it, it makes technical sense.

      If you don’t want to participate in leaderboards and just play single player and maybe co-op or PvP with trusted friends or on a curated server (like people do in Minecraft, Space Engineers, Terraria, old school shooters…), it’s just a degradation.

  • TemperateFox@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a new dad, that problem was solved by being too tired to game with the little free time anyway lol. Also emulators like yuzu work wonders here as you can just pause the emulator even if the game doesn’t support it.

    • sorenant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t even have a child yet the work related fatigue is enough to make me avoid intense/stressful games that I’d play when younger. I can’t imagine choosing to play a game rather than sleeping if I had to also take care of a newborn.

  • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s not a multiplayer game then it shouldn’t need to be online.

    Like I play Hitman a lot and occasionally the game pauses because it loses connection to the server even though it’s single-player. It’s usually able to reconnect but its still a bit annoying. And I am playing with 500mb internet and an ethernet connection, so the issue is on their side.

    So yeah, I really don’t see why it’s necessary or why it’s become such a trend.

  • Saauan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it might be a good anti-piracy measure. But it’s really sad for the accessibility of these games as a whole, especially when it is possible to play the game without any online features.

    I’m a big fan of the Steam Deck and Nintendo Switch ability to simply turn into sleep mode, which allows me to pause very easily games. But I guess that’s not possible with online games :/

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always-online has not affected me much. What you describe above about pausing is a coding issue, not an attribute of online play. To my knowledge, Watch Dogs 2 and Deep Rock Galactic work the same way: People can join your session at any random moment, but before they do, you can pause the game as normally.

  • noob_dragon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always a bit of a turn off for me. Ross (guy that did Gordon’s mind and game dungeon) has a pretty good series of videos about why online only games are bad because they can be killed. He really hates the idea of killing games, and I agree with him.

    Not only can the game get killed, however, but it can be changed fundamentally in a bad way. Balance can be tweaked for the worse etc. And unlike single player games you can’t revert back to a previous version.

    I also hate that LAN play has been pretty much stripped from the PC game landscape. LAN parties during college were the shit.

    • Running_Out_Of_Ideas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Overwatch 1 is a prime example in recent memory. I preordered the damn thing and got the fancy skin. I will probably never be able to play the sunsetted maps again. Never be able to recreate the broken fun of the first month after launch, when people would randomly form identical hero meme comps in quick play. Never be able to go back to before the battle pass, when you didn’t functionally have to pay to unlock new heroes.

      It’s a damn shame. Capitalism corrupts everything I love.

  • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    My internet access is through metered connections, so I find it quite agrivating to be forced to burn precious cap space on a game that could totally be local only.

  • dreadedchalupacabra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The always online is bad. The micro-transactions are worse. I’m tired of being told “But it’s just cosmetic!” Yeah, well that used to come with the game too. “They need to be able to make more content!” Yeah, it’s made over 666 million dollars. They can afford more content. “At least it’s not…” That shouldn’t exist either.

    Games, and expansion packs. That’s it. Day one MTX is insulting. “here’s your game, pay to unlock more of it” should not be a thing we accept. At this point I half expect a back-slide to pay full price and then a sub to actually play the game. I can not wrap my head around why people defend it, I’ve stopped buying games with MTX entirely.

    Diablo 2 resurrected is quite good, though. Nailed that one.