PlogLod@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 years agoI get that AMP sites are supposed to load faster. But why do they have to be so ugly?message-squaremessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1message-squareI get that AMP sites are supposed to load faster. But why do they have to be so ugly?PlogLod@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
Or why do they need to change the appearance from the original version of the page at all? It just looks unaesthetic
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down5·2 years agoBecause Google. That is all.
minus-square𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoAMP on its own and Google’s AMP service are two different things. AMP sites in general are better for mobile browsing. One should avoid Google’s AMP service, though.
Because Google. That is all.
AMP on its own and Google’s AMP service are two different things. AMP sites in general are better for mobile browsing. One should avoid Google’s AMP service, though.