• kariunai@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    “As of January 2022, the platform had approximately 40 million monthly active users.”[0]

    In 2022 they had $30M expenses, so the cost is somewhat under $1/user/year.

    They said the minimum donation is there to reduce the viability of scammers using it to check if a stolen credit card number is valid.

    [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Foundation

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Is it just they know they can only charge like $800 before they get shut down and want that extra $4 for themselves? I am still trying to understand the rationale. If I had no morales and a stolen cc, why would I care if it’s a $1 or a $5 charge for validation?

          I feel like I am learning I don’t check my cc info nearly as much as other Americans…

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        The point of scammers using a small value to test stolen numbers is they hope such small transactions go unnoticed for longer, allowing them a bigger time window to use and abuse the stolen card number.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          That just doesn’t make a lot of sense. I would question something under a dollar way more then something under $10