• BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tried Debian stable, kept not being able to get stuff to work because of the packages always being too old. Not advocating for Ubuntu either, but Debian? For a desktop? GTFO! I’d sooner start using emacs instead of vim.

          • M500@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            So many things these days are flatpaks and app images. So it almost doesn’t matter.

            I’m don’t know your situation but I’m sure there are reasons someone might not be able to use Debian desktop.

          • IRQBreaker@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            A somewhat anecdotal comment here, but I’ve using Debian stable as a daily driver for years, both at work and at home. Haven’t had any issues yet. It’s so stable it’s almost boring. 😀 However, this is fine since I can focus on getting stuff done instead of messing about with the distro.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wanted to, and did manage to figure the installer out once, but damn it’s user unfriendly… The os seems fine, installer was not. I had some other issues I was hoping would be fixed in Debian that weren’t, so unfortunately I did not stick with it

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moving to an entirely different operating system is a big step just to… end up with closed, proprietary software and spyware again.

      • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Snaps, I think I’ll pass.

        Even without them, I don’t have time to uninstall/remove everything I don’t need.

        DIY distros suit my needs more, but thanks anyway.

      • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you switch why not go alway? Try Linux from scratch or Arch/Debian, Ubuntu is only a few steps behind MS in term of spyware

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it really was that much spyware, the EU would already have created laws to do something about it.

      More likely is that it really isn’t spyware as much as it is basic unanimous telemetry, which you can disable in the settings.

    • skygirl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a person who cares about the gaming ecosystem, I think it would be really healthy for Microsoft to not have full market dominance.

      They’re busy making studio acquisitions which are gradually centralizing the market, which could become very problematic if they start taking anticompetitive approaches to distribution.

      More people on Linux means more pressure for software availability on Linux, and if people can just move over relatively easily that prevents Microsoft from going full corpo-digital-prison-hellscape.

    • JGrffn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like I don’t really care what my peers use, or what people in general use, but the more adoption linux desktop gets, the more people getting involved in community projects there are, as well as more bug reports and the like, so the sooner things get improved upon and the better they become.

    • noproblemmy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I care because by not using linux there is money going to microsoft or apple hands, which are not very friendly to user rights.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have people asking me to help them install linux all the time. I am glad, in theory, but sad, in the practicality of having to work for free on my spare time.

    • sederx@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      i used to care, now i dont give a flying fuck.

      if people are too stupid to use a superior and free system, fuck em.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lets be honest, people don’t switch to Linux because it’s better, we switch because of the cute pinguin mascot !

    • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows is made by a company that would make this change in some countries but not all countries. We are not free until we are all free. Some operating systems guarantee that. Others do not.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree with you but dude people are sick of the politicization of everything and their operating system doesn’t even get onto that radar. They are ignorant and quite happy of it. Please let the pigs eat their shit in peace.

        That said, it is quite telling that Microsoft apparently finds it more advantageous to have two divergent feature sets than to apply the change universally.

        • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get where you are coming from. FWIW I’m being a jackass for the hell of it rather than trying to start a flame war. But if someone is to get upset about it, perhaps its something for them to reflect on later.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a little naive to think that this was an incentive to use Linux for ppl in the first place.

  • tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Overnight, millions will suddenly somehow become European.

    I wonder if they will try IP based Geo enforcement? How long do you think before Rufus allows flipping the bit to force this globally on install?

  • JackSkellington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shouldn’t the same be applied to MacOS? There are a myriad of stupid apps impossible to uninstall. Maybe even safari

    • Dmian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While you can’t uninstall Safari, it doesn’t constantly discourage you to use other browsers like Edge does. Nor does Mac OS prevents you from installing competing apps.

      The bigger problem is iOS, but the EU already took care of that and we’ll be able to sideload apps on iOS pretty soon.

      • JackSkellington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, I forgot that part. Thanks! Still, it comes as weird for me to have software (zero tied to OS functions ) I cannot remove

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I remember Mac os ignoring my default browser choice many times and instead launching a web page in safari.

        • Dmian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          App association is done at the OS level, and the apps are normally responsible for that. So it could be either the OS not registering the selected browser properly or the other browser not registering itself correctly as the default browser.

          They need to basically register themselves as responsible for html files and a bunch of protocols (http, https, etc). I’ve never had a problem like that, and I’ve been using macs for almost 30 years (I’ve used many different browsers as default in the past).

          But browsers are pretty complicated beasts, so I believe you. There are a lot of things that can go wrong and your choice may not end up being respected.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mac literally doesn’t allow any other browser engine. They only allow webkit.

        So your options are:

        • Safari

        • Safari with Chrome aesthetics

        • Safari with Firefox aesthetics

        • Safari with [insert browser here] aesthetics

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Older MacOS versions had stuff like the chess game preinstalled for no reason, though I don’t know how current versions look like.

        I also don’t know how easy it is to remove preinstalled apps nowadays. Back in the day, you could disable System Integrity Protection, remove whatever you want, and re-enable Protection afterwards.

        • kurosawaa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That chess game even predates OS X, it was a tech demo that came with the NextStep OS and has barely changed since the mid nineties. At this point it would be said to see it go.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Oh man, I’d love to use Linux because then I wouldn’t have to have Edge installed!” - Nobody. Ever.

    People use Windows because it comes with the PC and it runs all their shit (maybe except some yellowing-beige and blue scanner from 1997) with no fucking about needed. They were never incentivised to use Linux. They don’t know what an OS is, and more importantly, they don’t care.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also most software is written for that default os and if they ran into most of the common issues linux users do theyd throw it in the bin.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree with the premise, but even if it’s true that people stay with Windows because it sucks less, that’s still a success story for Linux. External comparative pressure leading to more end user freedom. Think of where it could go next!

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are the limits of this new law? Certainly state sponsored spyware are protected from this, for example

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The overlap of people that will not remove the initial bloat (even if it’s a button displayed prominently on first start) and people inclined to use Linux in the first place is not that great.

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The year of the DESKTOP Linux. Linux has already won everywhere else.

  • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Edge isn’t as bad nowadays, and it’s not much more of a spyware than Google Chrome, the meme browser.