• helmet91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my opinion it’s not useless at all. Lemmy marks the comments as edited, but that’s just to show the fact that it was edited. But if you add the reason why you edited, that makes it a whole lot more transparent.

    Sometimes it could happen that I see a great comment full of great ideas from a great user, and it could be lengthy as well. Then later I go back to see the reactions, and I see the comment was edited. If I don’t know what was edited on it, then I have to read the whole comment again. But if it’s clearly stated that only typos were fixed, then I don’t bother with re-reading the comment.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy needs to get rid of edit if you edit within 1 min. Often you’ll see a typo after you post and you have to edit. There should be a grace period like reddit.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I do that all the time. No better time to proofread than after you post!

        I don’t get why there isn’t a “view edit” feature. Lay it all out.

    • stebo02@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      i think the point is that you only have to write “edit:” when you actually changed something in your message

      if there’s no “edit” it’s often safe to assume nothing really changed, it’s just a typo or a rewording

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is not worthless, it tells you that the post was edited and that the author didn’t try to hide it.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather have it be known why I’ve edited my message, rather than leave people to question if I’d edited the body or meaning of my message. In my case it’s an accredited science lab thing, but I imagine lots of corporate and legal professionals do the same.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also imagine things. Are you supporting your own position through things your brain created while staring out the window?

      • Pyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Supporting your position through things created in your brain is called “explaining yourself”, or more specifically “explaining the rationale behind your position”.

        Did you think you were being clever?

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as as you don’t use ETA as an abbreviation for “edited to add”, you are ok. That shit was suddenly everywhere on reddit, god darn kids and them fancy ambiguous acronyms!!! shakes fist at clouds

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes I don’t want to say "edit: my fat thumbs typed ‘thumps’ instead of ‘thumbs’ " but I don’t want anyone to assume foul play when they see my comment has been edited.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish there was a time allowance for editing comments without showing that the comment was edited. Something like 30 seconds would be enough to correct a misspelled or missing word. Most of my comments that are marked as edited are simple typos that I edit within a few seconds of posting them.

  • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Edit: because my social anxiety leaks into text and I have a desperate need to over share and over explain so people don’t mistake my thought or meaning.

  • powerofm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s a lot more complexity, but I wish we just had edit history for everything. You edited your comment? Easy enough for someone to go back and see that you didn’t change your meaning. You changed your opinion? Edit your post’s content and people will still know the context of the replies.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s worth the effort in 95% of cases. How many people would care to troll or argue like that? They’d hardly be reasoned with even if proofs are at hand.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Edit: Just to completely change the whole meaning of the post to make people who responded to me look like assholes.

  • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still prefer when people do that if it after people already replied. Especially if those typos were significant enough to cause misunderstandings. The whole chain just becomes confusing if you fix them without any edit log.

  • Art35ian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in the early days of Reddit if you edited something it was marked as such, but people didn’t know what you edited. So, as a courtesy, you explained your edit.

    Lots of platforms now have an ‘edited’ notification so it’s still common to leave the ‘E:’ comment.