I followed trash guides to set everything up blindly and my set up is working well. But, I feel like having jellyfin in the same docker compose as my “arr” services isn’t good. So, I’d be curious to see if I should split things up. I am even wondering if i should let portainer manage everything.

  • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arrs combined. Jellyfin alone. VPN with VPN stuff. Everything else alone. Unless it’s multiple of the same app.

  • Nyfure@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    i had arr in one stack and media in another.
    Now in my kubernetes cluster everything is separated, but arr + torrent is in vpn and automatically uses the vpn-sidecar. And media (jellyfin + jellyseer) is separate.

    • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Same.

      Jellyfin, Audiobookshelf, kavita = Media stack

      Arr suite, Vpn, BitTorrent = Pirate stack

      Edit:

      CodeServer, git, esphome, home assistant = Code Stack

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I created them in the same compose but will probably split them up soon. There’s no point in having them in the same file: *arr services and jacket interact with each other, but Jellyfin is its own thing and I often want/need to restart it alone. They’re best as 2 separate stacks imo.

    • CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can interact with a single container if you need to, not just the whole compose group. docker compose restart jellyfin works for your example, and “restart” can be swapped for stop or start as needed.

      Splitting compose files can be a good idea, but it isn’t always necessary.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        yes, but I use one alias for all stacks to down, pull, up as a daemon, and watch its logs.

        So I’d rather split the stack than have a special treatment for it.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s no point in having them in the same file

      Convenience is the reason for a lot of people

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        if these are the only services one is self hosting, I can see that.

        But I have around a dozen stacks atm and I never came across a situation that I wanted to trigger an *arr stack restart with Jellyfin’s. They’re pretty much unrelated and independent services from an operational view.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You can issue commands to singular services or group them under an alies if needed.

          But I have around a dozen stacks atm and I never came across a situation that I wanted to trigger an *arr stack restart with Jellyfin’s. They’re pretty much unrelated and independent services from an operational view.

          I’m more talking about pull, up -d. It’s convenient having it all behind a single command, unless there’s a special need to have them separated

  • Chris@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I liked having them all in the same file - easier to keep everything in sync. I also had “dependency” links to keep things starting in order.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why separate it? It’s part of the same stack. Radar downloads, Jellyfin plays.

  • Clegko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have all of mine in their respective directories and have a master script that I run to bring them all up or take them down. Easier to exclude services from start up if I end up not needing them or something.

  • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to try to run arr stack together, but separately from jellyfin and transmission because I use them not only with arr things

    But now I’m using nixos, and having the same dilemma with .nix files

  • grygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A mix - my *arrs, Plex, etc run in my “media” stack’s compose, but I have a handful of other stacks (“managing”, “monitoring”, “misc”, “games”, etc) for containers that aren’t related.

    This also helps keep networks separate so the containers are only talking to the ones I want them to

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    No Docker, because overhead and depending on a semi-closed ecosystem isn’t cool. Also systemd is perfectly capable of providing all the security docker does by itself.