rosenjcb@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoYou cant even avoid irrelevant results with "site:" anymorelemmy.worldimagemessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down149
arrow-up1401arrow-down1imageYou cant even avoid irrelevant results with "site:" anymorelemmy.worldrosenjcb@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square113fedilink
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoIf you’re double-checking the sources, both to make sure that they exist, and they are accurate, you may as well do the research without using an LLM in the first place. You’re just adding to your workload unnecessarily in that case.
minus-squarequeermunist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’m thinking that double checking is slightly faster than doing the research yourself.
If you’re double-checking the sources, both to make sure that they exist, and they are accurate, you may as well do the research without using an LLM in the first place.
You’re just adding to your workload unnecessarily in that case.
I’m thinking that double checking is slightly faster than doing the research yourself.