• Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What part of Matrix is proprietary? It’s not an app, instead, it’s an open protocol that can be used by anyone to build a messaging app or host a server.

      • kpw@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Matrix isn’t proprietary, but effectively controlled by a single VC funded startup. We don’t need a bloated re-invention of existing internet standards anyways. They should just make a better XMPP client.

          • kpw@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, but compatibility with existing internet standards is also important. For example you can’t have end-to-end encryption if you use a non-standard protocol. VC startups like Matrix only increase fragmentation of the ecosystem.

              • kpw@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The organization is called the IETF. The XMPP core is defined in RFC 6120 and RFC 6121 like DNS, HTTP, etc. are defined in RFCs.

                • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  TIL that XMPP is defined in an RFC. You’re correct, I wasn’t aware of that. I really don’t understand why the IETF take such a decision though. I don’t know why these guys are defining high-level protocols for things like messaging at all.

                  But back to your earlier points:

                  For example you can’t have end-to-end encryption if you use a non-standard protocol

                  This doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Matrix has E2EE while using a “non-standard” protocol. So does Signal, in fact, it created the strongest E2EE protocol out there.

                  VC startups like Matrix only increase fragmentation of the ecosystem

                  Every new project that is created increases fragmentation. So does Revolt, Discord, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, etc. These all use “non-standard” protocols.

                  Also, the author of RFC 6120 is a Cisco employee, how is a multinational corporation better than a VC-funded startup? XMPP is an open standard, just like the Matrix protocol. It doesn’t matter who created it.

                  • kpw@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There are lots of high-level standards for communication. You might have heard of email, its protocols are also defined by the IETF. For instant messaging it is XMPP.

                    This doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Matrix has E2EE while using a “non-standard” protocol.

                    You can only encrypt messages when the recipient happens to be a Matrix user too. If they use another protocol it’s not possible. That’s why we need standards and that’s why building on existing internet standards is important as opposed to everyone cooking up their own IM protocol like Matrix does.

                    Every new project that is created increases fragmentation. So does Revolt, Discord, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, etc. These all use “non-standard” protocols.

                    Yes, they all increase fragmentation as they do not interoperate with one another. A standard would solve this problem.

                    Lot’s of standards are written by people who work at large corporations. Also multiple experts from multiple corporations work together. Wasn’t the original author of the XMPP protocol was hired after the fact by Cisco, precisely because he wrote XMPP and the first server implementation?

                    The IETF still has a much better track record than any single corporation or VC funded start-up.