• SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if we stopped all use of fossil fuels overnight, there’s a lot of ‘baked in’ warming. This isn’t ‘instead of’ it’s ‘in addition to’ when it comes to halting warming.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep, it takes about 30 years to see the effects, what we’re dealing with right now is the 1993 emissions, if we stopped using all fossil fuels right this instant things would continue to get worse well into the 2050s.

  • TiffyBelle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Simpsons isn’t just an animated sitcom. It’s a documentary about the future:

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Won’t help with ocean acidification. Stop using fossil fuels, leave it in the ground.

    • maggoats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I saw a link to a study that modeled outcomes within the next fre decades where acidification kills enough marine life and favors the reproduction of other microbes. Something about either low oxygen in the oceans and/or the atmosphere, or maybe a dangerous increase in stmospheric toxins resulting from that.

      Maybe I’ll try and find it to verify.

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given much of the transition to renewable energy is planned to be solar this may be counterproductive. China is rolling out monumental amounts of solar at the moment, we can’t just block the sun since it’s part of the solution.

  • justdoit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Growing evidence that governments/corporations would sooner give up seeing the goddamn sun than get off even a fraction of fossil fuel usage

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s a combination of hubris and desperation. Hubris because it could still go very wrong and serve us a frozen extinction instead of a boiling one. Desperation because those who acknowledge what’s happening know that something probably needs to be done to not only stop but reverse this but the corporations might be more likely to burn it all down protecting their interests than cooperate.

        The “easy” solutions will likely lead to war and might not even help anything at this point. The promising technologies still need to be scaled up (also in a way that makes sure we don’t overshoot the cooling targets or remove so much CO2 that plants die out).

        The more I think of it, the more I like this desperate idea. If it does work too well, we can always just send more rockets to move whatever it is out of the way. Which we should have built and ready to go shortly after the blocker is deployed. Preferably sitting in orbit to minimize the chances of it screwing up if desperately needed.

        Hmm sunlight is also a carbon reducer since it drives photosynthesis. But desperate times…

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          All I can think of is the last episode of the show Dinosaurs. This is the wax fruit factory and the bunch beetles all over again, except with us as the stars of our own show.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            God damn was that a downer ending for a lighthearted sitcom. That kids watched. I didn’t see the final episode until I was an adult, but I bet a bunch of kids were traumatized when it first aired.

            Imagine if, instead of the four of them ending in jail at the end of Seinfeld, they died in a nuclear holocaust. Or if How I Met Your Mother ended with zombies eating the whole gang while we watched them scream. I’m guessing that was the level of trauma for kids watching the finale of Dinosaurs.

            • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was a total downer. As an adult, I don’t watch that episode anymore. It had some enjoyable content, but I can’t start it because of how bleak it gets. Otherwise, that show is probably among my top 50.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The main aerosols proposed for SRM also cause ozone depletion and acid rain. There is some level of control as to where the bad consequences and up and which regions get more extreme weather.

          Anyone want to take a guess as to which countries won’t end up with the consequences?

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean this is just saying the US is open to researching the possibility. They aren’t even committing to researching it.

      “However, the report also clarifies that no decision has been made to “establish a comprehensive research programme focused on solar radiation modification.””

      It’s a very prudent decision to study it. We can determine and quantify the risks this way.

    • zoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      taxing the rich properly would (blasphem alert) help redistribute wealth among workers and decrease inflation, and also make the world colder, since we dont have to work as much. but i guess we would be stripped from our daily dose of uv light soon. yea who needs vitamin b3 anyway ?