Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

    Android supposedly has an option to side load, and even install another store, but in order to do it, you get through a series of warnings, and such stores can’t even be on the play store. So for an ordinary user you feel like you are hacking the phone. So naturally there aren’t many alternatives. The only one that lasted is F-Droid, but it seems to be only used by advanced users who want to run open source software.

    So simply, theoretically they should be able to do whatever they want practically everyone has to stick to play store.

    Play store has a rule, that additional charges need to go through them (and they of course charge 30%). This probably would still be ok, but then certain vendors don’t need to follow the same rules.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe that is the crux of it. And apparently part of the trial exposed that some big players have special deals such that don’t have to pay those in-app purchase commissions, or at least have a smaller commission. And that’s what makes it an abuse of their market position.