• AmberPrince@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is concern that Threads will use embrace, extend, extinguish to depreciate the ActiviyPub protocol. Essentially, they adopt the open standard, expand on it with proprietary additions, then when everyone is using the modified standard they drop support for the open standard and now everyone has to play ball by their rules.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m also worried that due to content moderation policies, Threads might choose to federate only with a few handpicked mastodon instances. Thus provoking a huge increase of users in these instances because they want to interact with people on threads and causing a centralisation issue, because people will start joining this instances far more than the others.

      It would also render useless self hosting a single user instance for yourself.

    • farcaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, yes that is a fair enough concern. Thanks. There are lessons in the fate of XMPP (and HTML with IE I guess?). However ActivityPub seems to have so much more momentum than XMPP ever had. This makes me more optimistic about Fedi.

      Also, unlike with messaging which is much more dependent on a small number of people you interact with, I think microblogging is much more personal. If Threads would join, grow big, and then defederate 5 years later I may miss out on following some people but that still wouldn’t make me leave Mastodon. I left Twitter after all.

      Still, it’s a reasonable and interesting concern.