I’m talking about the fight/fuck/dominate hormones. Testosterone, estrogen. The reason why putting a pretty girl in an advertisement works so well. And it might explain a lot of aggression too.
Take them out of the equation and that’s 99% of politics, advertising and popular music gone.
So what would that look like for society?
Would it be Star Trek? Would it be a dystopia?
What about the individual??
Flat effect no ambition misery? Or creative powerhouse and visionary?
Give me your speculations.
I’m assuming you don’t mean people abusing steroids, but hormones, period (no pun intended), because you say they’re used by everybody.
So, okay. I’m a biologist and I’m not sure how to answer this question except to say that we wouldn’t exist. By “we” I pretty much mean life on earth as we know it.
Let’s start with Wikipedia:
A hormone (from the Greek participle ὁρμῶν, “setting in motion”) is a class of signaling molecules in multicellular organisms that are sent to distant organs by complex biological processes to regulate physiology and behavior.[1] Hormones are required for the correct development of animals, plants and fungi.
A hormone is not a drug.
A drug is any chemical substance that when consumed causes a change in an organism’s physiology, including its psychology, if applicable.[1][2][vague] Drugs are typically distinguished from food and other substances that provide nutritional support
You can take hormones as drugs, but drugs are things that are consumed. Hormones produced within your body are part of and necessary to maintaining your life from before you are a you until the day you die. They regulate your metabolism. They’re directly responsible for keeping your body alive and in sync with the environment. They’re everywhere - animals, plants, and fungi.
So, no, please don’t get rid of hormones. We’re using them.
Now, diseases and disorders caused by hormonal dysfunction are a different story. Those, hopefully, can be treated medically or with therapy. That’s a different question, though.
Me, a misanthrope: “so you’re saying we should definitely get rid of hormones”
You body begins to die a painful but probably mercifully quick death. Hormones are vital to your bodies continual survival and even if you targeted specific ones, you’d just be creating problems for yourself. Elimated dopamine? Congrats you’ve given yourself ADHD and a host of other personality problems. Melotonin? Oops no more sleep for you, enjoy your sudden weight gain and compromised immune system. We don’t take hormones, we are hormones.
No insulin? Dead in 2-7 days.
I thought dopamine was a neurotransmitter not a hormone.
Not what I meant. Edited for clarity.
Given that hormones control most of the processes occurring in our bodies, there wouldn’t be a society as there wouldn’t be any individuals
deleted by creator
All of these have very real physical effects, and human life cannot exist without them.
You know, most of you people can’t seem to get a point unless it’s boldfaced, underlined and verbosely detailed. It makes communication difficult.
Not to whine or anything. Just part of the process.
“How dare you take what I said at face value!”
Look at this guy. Thinks words have a face.
Hormones is too broad a word to use without being more specific. ‘Taken by everybody’ is a bit broad and inaccurate. Personally I have to inject a very powerful hormone several times a day to avoid dying, which most people produce naturally in sufficient quantities (insulin). I assume you’re talking about exogenous testosterone and I agree, people without a medical need for this should not have access to it.
Ok. I thought it was obvious. Edited.
The problem honestly is your concept of hormones is incomplete. There are no hormones that only do one thing. They might have a primary function. But they all have secondary and tertiary functions. They all regulate other hormones. Evolution doesn’t do single functions.
If you knock down a “fight” hormone you’re probably going to mess up the homeostasis of the body in other ways. You can probably “fix” that artificially, but you’ll be constantly chasing the next side effect. Humans are chemical Rube Goldberg machines of infinite order. Disrupt one thing and it all goes out of whack.
Then go with “freedom fom the mind-altering influences”. What would that look like?
That doesn’t exist, considering things as basic as hungry is a mind-altering influence
There was a whole explanatory block of text after the title that you missed.
I’m referring to the big famous mind-altering hormones. Testosterone, estrogen. The fighting and fucking urge that shapes 99% of politics, advertising and popular music.
Here’s a handy list of hormones produced by the body: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_hormones
Look at the list of affects in the right hand column. I doubt most of us would form into viable embryos beyond a few weeks, let alone form a society.
There’s a whole block of text there in my op that I think you skipped
Time to report any transphobic comments made here and block them 🤣
Seriously it’s like some of the people coming here can’t help it
What about the individual??
Flat effect no ambition misery? Or creative powerhouse and visionary?
Personal experience: I spent my entire youth and a large portion of my adulthood being amazingly preoccupied with sex, and with a fair amount of aggression towards everyone and everything.
Between testiulcar cancer, many consistent years of antidepressants, and just being old, I am finally feeling relief from those. I don’t claim to be a “creative powerhouse and visionary” by any stretch, but I am far from having a flat affect, I’m no more or less ambitious than I was before, and I am decidedly less miserable.
In hindsight, I can see that libido and aggression have always been an obstacle to my reaching my potential. Having built some bad habits over decades, they still are. None of us get to accomplish everything we want, so I’m trying not to fret about it too much.
Overall, as an individual whose life experience has changed from one extreme to the other - whether hormones have anything to do with it or not - I much prefer the current stage in my life to the former.
The influence of these hormones, it could be likened to being drunk all the time. But everybody’s drunk, so it’s normal.
Maybe later generations will invent a switch or a therapy.
I think that St Augustine cut off his balls. Puberty was coming on. He didn’t like what it was doing to his clarity of mind. So he grabbed the scissors.
He was an impressive guy.
Born 1700 years ago. He adapted Classical thought to Christian teaching and created a powerful theological system of lasting influence. He also shaped the practice of biblical exegesis and helped lay the foundation for much of medieval and modern Christian thought.
So there’s one argument for. If he was born today he might have written a nice video game.
deleted by creator
That applies to Testosterone / Estrogen, yes. But keep in mind that there are a lot of non-sexual hormones as well. Insulin and Adrenaline for example are also hormones, and if a body stops producing enough insulin, you can’t exactly claim that “not a lot changes”.
Well Insulin for an example doesn’t change behavior which is what OP primarily asked about. But it certainly would cause issues if it was gone.
Adrenaline’s function is primarily pain numbing agent with the additional effect of increasing resource flow to your muscles.
Honestly 99% of hormones don’t affect behavior but rather so our physical biological activity. When I say “Not a lot” I mean mentally. Physically you’d fucking die tho lmao
To be honest, I get the feeling that the OP isn’t interested in a good faith argument and just wants to push an agenda, given how hard they try to change their question to get the answers they want to hear … logic and reason won’t help much with this kind of discussion.
And looking at some of the other comments here (not yours, for the record), I’d better leave this thread before it deteriorates too much ^^° I’ll leave that drama to people who can handle it (I have a bit of a thin skin today, sorry)
Ok I’ll bite. What’s my hidden agenda?
I’m a big science fiction fan. I speculate as easily as I breathe. I’m in the minority.
For the majority, to fill the hole where speculative exploration should be, there is nitpicking, pedantry.
It was a poorly worded question, no need to be defensive.
Well now that you are clear as to my point, could you give me your speculations?
Yes yes, I’m referring to the big famous mind-altering hormones specifically.
Pre-puberty I was less aggressive and did not look twice at girls.
That’s 99% of politics and advertising down the crapper right there.
I’d call that a pretty big difference.
…Nobody would exist, those hormones are what allowed humanity to survive and reproduce long enough to ask this question.
As crude as those things are when you look at the worst parts of humanity, they’re necessary.
Well now that we’ve survived long enough. What if we did it today? What if we removed the aggression and the fixation on titties and the rest. Just extracted the whole mental influence there.
We’d die out. It’s clearly a question that’s hyperfocused on the worst aspects of it.
We successfully complete many projects that arguably have nothing to do with our hormonal fight/fuck imperative.
Why do you think that the “maintaining the population” project would be different?
Because those hormones are also involved with making people want to do those things. Just because you associate them specifically with fight/fuck doesn’t mean thats all they do. “humanity” is heavily tied to those hormones.
Like i’ve been stressing for this entire discussion you’re hyperfocused on two things for a subject that is far more multifaceted than that.
Yes, “humanity” is heavily tied to those hormones. And humanity is also motivated by much other than those hormones. So to conclude that without hormonal influences we would necessarily abandon important projects like “keeping the population maintained” seems rather hasty.
So let’s consider some more interesting results than “we would all just die”. Because no doubt they exist.
Come on, exercise your speculation muscles.
Intro thoughts, feel free to skip to next paragraph: What you’re basically suggesting (based off edit) is the massive and unrelenting attack on our more base urges. My boyfriend says this is “peripheral route persuasion”, and it includes sex appeal and also things like happy people drinking Coke. Indeed advertising almost exclusively uses these tactics to get you to buy something (or at least remember) within 30 seconds or less.
But I think you’re getting at the main core of human interaction, where the natural order of people is to act based off of emotion and not really think about it. Alternately, you can put your mind into big-brain thinking mode and make a salient choice to not drink brown spiced lemon fizzy sugar water.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model essentially assumes that “As motivation and/or ability to process arguments is decreased, peripheral cues become relatively more important determinants of persuasion. Conversely, as argument scrutiny is increased, peripheral cues become relatively less important determinants of persuasion.” These peripheral cues can be hormone based, for example. Therefore, it suggests a central route of information processing (think hard about it), and a peripheral route of information processing (gut feeling).
This is any information, not just persuasion. You see hot girl on street, you consider your car looks cool, you try to pick her up by using your*(edit) car as evidence to hop in.
Btw, in the Wikipedia article they literally spell out the consequences of this theory in Politics, Advertising and Media (all of it).
Imagine a society made up of eight-year-olds. Gentle, un-aggressive. Couldn’t care less about titties. Incredible clarity of mind.
There would still be art and science. Soccer and carpentry would still be fun.
We just wouldn’t have that little pseudococaine gland squirting into our bloodstream 24-7.
deleted by creator
