• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yet another reason why IoT crap sucks. You don’t need to put everything on the internet. This one should be obvious.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      People don’t think about that. You have to register somewhere in order to use your $12.99 cam, install some app and are good to go.

      How would a someone not interested in tech know that the footage data is stored on some online server and you are at the mercy of their itsec.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        depends on the device.

        If the device dont provide local connection, there is nothing home assistant can do about it. Some device will also send data to the cloud even it is locally controlled by HA.

        • books@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh for sure. But unlike smart things or any other hub, only the data that needs a cloud connection will go through the cloud…

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thanks to laziness of the device manufacturers, a lot of them either expose some data endpoints locally, or just use Zigbee which can be easily paired to be used local-only.

          Those that require Wi-Fi access can be filtered on the router to disable internet access.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      With end to end encryption, and requiring manual key transfer (no key sync), this would not be an issue.