• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      personally I think its better to be afraid of real things that are happening than things made up by Facebook boomers.

      why this particular issue fools even the most technical of people I’ll never know.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        But Facebook can’t spy on me, I repost the “I DO NOT GIVE FACEBOOK PERMISSION” spam every 3 months without fail!

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          obviously what you vaguely describe has been around since 1945.

          That home assistant devices are constantly listening and feeding back marketing data on every conversation is patent and disproven nonsense.

          they have done packet sniffing investigations, they have disassembled the devices, they have run meters on the electrical charges… everything in every way you can imagine.

          But even if you just think about it for a second - processing a live audio feed at a rate of 1 second per second indefinitely and correlating that data via voice recognition to your Google profile all to… make your ad personalizations… worse? more inaccurate?

          like what the hell is the perceived benefit? That my wife says, “oh my dad found my old barbie house!” while at my neighbors house and my neighbor gets served barbie ads? Why would Google want that?

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        At some point ever you’re going to realize is that the real things you need to be afraid of are largely caused by the stuff made up by Facebook boomers.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          what specifically? vaccines cause autism/monkeypox, the democrats drink baby blood, trump won the last/next election, Putin is good because he’s only killing Nazis in Ukraine, forest fires are caused by Jewish space lasers, LGBTQ+ folks are grooming children and Bill Gates wants to put microchips in your brain?

          Like — what are you saying, some misinformation is good?

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      Source: I work at Amazon, and have worked on Alexa

      They don’t spy on you without your permission. Comments like these devalue actual instances where companies genuinely steal and manipulate data. Take the tin foil hat off…

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Source: I work at Amazon, and have worked on Alexa

        If you’re high enough level at Amazon to know for sure, you’re also high enough level at Amazon to almost definitely lie to people about it and other things as part of your job.

        So no, we will not be taking your word for it.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          That doesn’t make any sense. If I were “higher up”, do you think I would be actually doing any IC work? I’d be in management, and probably won’t even know where to look at any of the fucking source code.

          Feel free not to take my word for it, but also feel free to ask anyone that has any experience with Alexa, or anyone that has monitored traffic leaving the device.

          Is Lemmy just full of conspiracy nuts or something?

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            If I were “higher up”, do you think I would be actually doing any IC work

            If you weren’t, why would you have access to enough data to know for sure whatv every part of it does and doesn’t do?

            free to ask anyone that has any experience with Alexa, or anyone that has monitored traffic leaving the device.

            So basically biased people and people who might lose their jobs if they say anything Amazon doesn’t want people to know? Sure, sounds credible!

            There’s conspiracy theories and then there’s expecting that a company that has been proven to spy on people without their knowledge will spy on people without their knowledge.

            • EnderMB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s not how it works, at all, at ANY tech company. I know, because Amazon has a shared GitFarm, with detailed documentation on how things work, and most importantly the better part of a decade where no one inside or outside of the company has found the device “listening”.

              I said it elsewhere, but will repeat since you clearly have no idea about the tech industry. Amazon treats it’s corp employees like shit. If ANYONE was going to leak shit about their employer doing something shitty, it would be an Amazon employee, especially since their URA process is so widely known.

              IF Amazon get caught spying, they get everything that they deserve. I’ve never worked in the Ring org, so whatever they do is on them, and if they get caught being shitty with customer data they should be punished severely. What I can say, which (again) is backed by a decade of people not calling out the really-fucking-easily-verified fact that Alexa isn’t phoning home outside of the utterances you say to it. Wakewords don’t leave the device, they’re an offline trigger to get the “actual” content.

              I’ll repeat it again, this is an insane take that I haven’t experienced after a decade of posting on Reddit and Twitter. Why is the fediverse full of conspiracy theorists that don’t do basic research before making statements?

            • Zangoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Tell me you’re not a software developer without telling me you’re not a software developer.

              If you’re working on the code the only thing that might change is not having access to the release/staging environments (production databases, cloud server, etc.) but you would need access to the code itself (and development database/services), so it wouldn’t be too difficult to check if the code is keeping voice recordings

              (italicized is edited in for clarity)

              Additionally, the higher up you are, the less code you usually write. With software development being higher up usually means more meetings, team management, planning, and higher level infrastructure talk.

              (Obligatory disclaimer that I’m pretty new in software development, this is the experience in the company I work at and seems to be pretty standard among other companies as well)

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So your theory as to why you haven’t seen evidence is that there’s a conspiracy of people withholding the evidence. I gotta ask, do you have evidence of that conspiracy?

      • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Consent could be argued that it was given upon purchase of the Alexa unit…

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          True, that is more accurate. IMO, in those instances, Amazon get all the shit that they deserve…although for many instances these are in their terms of service. There has been no shortage of scandals where Amazon have used utterance data for training ML models, or where they’ve retained voice data for the same reasons, when these have been in the TOS from the beginning.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you had any remote idea about the tech industry, you’d know what kind of reputation Amazon has. If Amazon were stealing data, you can bet your ass that one of its employees (probably one of the ~6% that gets fired every year) would happily rat them out.

          Comments like these amaze me. Even cesspools like Reddit and Twitter wouldn’t be so out of touch and stupid.

            • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’re not completely wrong, though. If the devices are phoning home when the mic is disabled, then someone would have discovered it by now. There are people who do that shit for fun, and Amazon is a big target.

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                11 months ago

                As someone who has Google Home and used to have Alexa:

                I have network tools tracking what these devices are doing just to see if they are constantly listening or doing anything weird.

                In 4 years I’ve yet to see anything suspicious, which sucks, cuz it’d be worth so much fucking money to the media