Steam no longer supports Windows 7, 8, and 8.1::Customers sticking to the good-old (and dead) Windows 7 now have one more reason to ditch the operating system: as of January 1, 2024, Steam no longer supports Windows 7, 8, and 8.1.

  • btaf45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is ridiculous that Steam won’t let you play your games you payed for outside of steam. Games that you’ve played for years on Windows 7 suddenly no longer play. Steam is like a DRM system that suddenly stops working and makes all the stuff you bought worthless.

    • LiveLGNProsper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      What if a security exploit happens to affect that older version of Steam that’s no longer updated and somebody’s able to hack your account change your password change your email now they have a brand new entire steam library that you no longer have anymore. Would you rather that? This is more of them covering themselves legally, so if that were to happen, they cannot be sued

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Would you rather that?

        I would rather Steam let me play all my games I legally purchased on Windows 7 outside of steam. If Steam is not going to work on Windows 7 than stay the hell out of the way and let me play the games I bought and have installed on my computer.

        I hope somebody sues them for stealing their purchased games.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          This isn’t Steam’s fault. The OS is dead because Microsoft killed it (as part of their ongoing planned-obsolescence operating system program). There is no conceivable way Steam can maintain security for anyone’s account on an OS that hasn’t received security updates for three years.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Jesus Christ 🤦‍♂️

            The OS is over 10 years old. No one in Linux land gets that level of support either.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Nothing unusual about cutting the cord at some point when major updates introduce big enough differences that it becomes a pain to make sure things stay compatible. Same thing happen with any OS.

            I swear some people around here must be mad that Microsoft doesn’t release Windows 98 updates anymore…

            • btaf45@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Microsoft doesn’t stop you from playing the games that already ran on your Windows 98 computer either. False equivelance.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Then don’t buy your games on Steam if you don’t like the way they do business, you’ve got other options, vote with your wallet and only buy DRM free games.

                You still wouldn’t be able to play those Windows 98 games if they were bought on Steam, because they’ve stopped supporting that OS ages ago and for good reasons. It doesn’t support modern tech, it doesn’t receive security updates, there’s no point wasting money on supporting it, just like there’s no point wasting money on supporting an OS that hasn’t received a security update in close to a year and that less than 2% of users are using until they finally move on to the next version.

                • btaf45@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Then don’t buy your games on Steam if you don’t like the way they do business, you’ve got other options, vote with your wallet and only buy DRM free games.

                  I wasn’t expecting they would take away the games I legally purchased.

                  You’re really okay with Steam being able to take away all the games you purchased whenever it feels like doing this? A rich asshole like Elon Musk could buy Steam and shut it down just to fuck with people, saying he just wanted the employees or some piece of tech. You wouldn’t complain at all if that happened?

                  You still wouldn’t be able to play those Windows 98 games if they were bought on Steam

                  That’s why I buy them on GOG and not Steam.

                  • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    That’s why I buy them on GOG and not Steam.

                    So all your stupid posturing in this thread was just to bait people into an argument with you?

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Look at the EULA, you’re not buying the game, you’re buying the right to play it and that right can be taken from you at any time, that’s been the main criticism against the switch to digital platforms from the moment Steam started existing and if you had taken 30 seconds to think about it you would have realized it. Heck, just the fact that you can get banned from Steam and lose access to your library should have made that pretty fucking clear!

                    That's why I buy them on GOG and not Steam.

                    Make up your fucking mind, do you or do you not buy games on Steam?

                    GOG didn’t exist in 2003, Steam supported Windows 9x then and one day they stopped supporting it, so you probably have games on it that went from being playable to not being playable on W98 or XP or Vista. You never stopped to think about that when deciding to continue running an OS that reached its end of life?

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            There is no conceivable way Steam can maintain security for anyone’s account

            Then they need to drop the DRM nonsense and let people use their desktop applications/games that they purchased.

            It IS Steam’s fault that Steam forces people to use a DRM system which they then shut down. Who else’s fault would it be?

            It’s not Google’s fault that Steam forces people to use a DRM system which they then shut down.

            It’s not Microsoft’s fault that Steam forces people to use a DRM system which they then shut down.

            It’s not Windows 7/8 user’s fault that Steam forces people to use a DRM system which they then shut down.

            I can play GOG games without using GOG. The least that Steam can do is created a lightweight app that let’s users play the games that they have already installed on their computer. Forget about “security” and “accounts”. Just don’t get in the way of users running their own games on their own computers.

            • flamingarms@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              You want Valve to develop a version of Steam that circumvents their own DRM to play local files? What would prevent people from using that to pirate things even more easily? I can imagine they’d have some trouble with publishers as well for doing that. There are already largely standardized cracks for steam and emulators for steam; just use that. Regardless, no solution will work for any game using DRM other than Steam, like Denuvo, so you’ll have to rely on pirates for those regardless.

              • btaf45@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                You want Valve to develop a version of Steam that circumvents their own DRM to play local files? Yes, exactly. They owe people that.

                What would prevent people from using that to pirate things even more easily? Dunno. Maybe make it not work on win 10+.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Are you running an OS that hasn’t received a security update in a year (if you purchase the ESU packages)???

      Dude, at least move on to Windows 10 or something, that’s just you taking bad decisions at this point.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I like Windows 7 precisely because I still have complete control over my computer. Microsoft cannot brick my computer on a whim like they have the power to with later versions of windows.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “brick my computer on a whim”

          Paranoid much?

          It’s funny that you fear Microsoft but not all the people that can exploit all the flaws that are now left open in your computer because you haven’t received a single security update in 357 days (or more since the last three years were paid updates).

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Odds that these computers were infected by something in the first place?

              Pretty fucking high.

              I support multiple computers at all times that are always running the latest Windows version, never had one where an update broke it and if it happened it’s a pretty major leap to go from “that update broke my computer” to “Microsoft intentionally bricked my computer”

              It’s also completely ridiculous because you’re implying that the same situation couldn’t have happened with a Windows 7 update.

              • btaf45@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                update broke my computer” to “Microsoft intentionally bricked my computer”

                Didn’t say it was intentional. Why would it be intentional?

                It’s also completely ridiculous because you’re implying that the same situation couldn’t have happened with a Windows 7 update.

                You can turn Windows 7 updates off. You can also control the timing of the updates.

                Odds that these computers were infected by something in the first place?

                Zero since they specifically noticed it happened during the update process.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Didn’t say it was intentional?

                  Microsoft cannot brick my computer on a whim like they have the power to with later versions of windows.

                  You can turn updates off for the following versions of Windows too.

                  Chances are they update broke because their computer was infected by something that didn’t play well with the update, I don’t know why you would think the odds are zero and don’t know why you would think something similar couldn’t happen with a Windows 7 update (not that you would care since you don’t get updates anymore, but you might want to care about infection risks though, going on the internet for you is like joining an orgy and leaving your condoms at the door).

                  • btaf45@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    “On a whim” means they unintentionally throw out a sloppy updates that bricks some computers. Which I have given you evidence of.

                    You can turn updates off for the following versions of Windows too.

                    Not permanently except for corporate versions.

                    Chances are they update broke because their computer was infected by something that didn’t play well with the update,

                    Chances are much more likely the update broke their computer because their computer contained some software and/or drivers too obscure for Microsoft QA to care about.

        • Hyrulian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          I feel like this group of people are the kind that would already be on Linux though. If you’re that anti Microsoft why be on any version of Windows when such a great suitable replacement that also still works on these older systems exists?

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            I feel like this group of people are the kind that would already be on Linux though.

            I have plenty of Linux machines and used Unix since before Linux existed. But when I want to play WINDOWS games and dont want to deal with wine hassles I need a windows box.

            • Voyajer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Wine hassles? It’s not 2013 anymore. Proton sets up a prefix on first run and you don’t think about it.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’ll probably even have more issues on Win7 for gaming than on Linux lol

                No DX12 support, questionable driver support from AMD/Nvidia, Win7 CPU scheduling not playing well with plenty of recent CPUs, etc.

    • rush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Note that dropping support for Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 came as part of a butterfly effect of the Chromium project - which Steam depends on - dropping support.

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s a store and content downloader. Buy games that don’t implement steamworks and you can copy the install folder to keep playing on windows 7 just fine without logging in.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Steam isn’t DRM, it’s a game storefront/downloader that offers developers the option of DRM when they publish their game.

        Plenty of games have zero DRM, and plenty of games do. I wish they’d make it clearer which do and which don’t, but that’s a separate issue.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is ridiculous that Steam won’t let you play your games you payed for outside of steam

      Very easy to run your previously purchased steam games without Steam. Search “Steam emulator”, follow the GitHub or Codeberg link, and problem solved…

      Won’t help with games that use their own custom DRM though.

    • Disposable_User@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re right with what you said except for Steam is not like DRM. Steam is DRM!
      People will defend Valve with tooth and nails, but like every other digital system, one day it will fuck with their users (my guess is when Gabe Newell retires).
      I can barely wait for that day, to see thousands of posts of users crying, because they never purchased anything, only rented! ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Plenty of people hated Steam when it first came out, it was a controversial thing when games started to require it.

        Steam has only become as popular as it is because Valve responded to much of that criticism, and improved it enough to become “acceptable” DRM in the minds of most gamers. People defend it because it came to work (mostly) seamlessly and offer additional beneficial features. Unlike many other far jankier platforms/launchers which have been developed with minimum effort as more transparent cash grabs.

        A DRM free world be be ideal, but we rarely get an ideal world, so people settle for the least worst instead.