Voters spurned Beijing’s repeated calls not to vote for Lai, delivering a comfortable victory for a man China’s ruling Communist Party sees as a dangerous separatist.
Lai Ching-te of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vowed to defend the island from China’s “intimidation” and on Sunday the island’s foreign ministry told Beijing to accept the result.
“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs calls on the Beijing authorities to respect the election results, face reality and give up suppressing Taiwan in order for positive cross-strait interactions to return to the right track,” it said in a statement.
Funny, I just had a whole bunch of hexbear and ml lemmy tankies dogpile on me for, not even suggesting necessarily that Taiwan seems to desire that it be independent from China, but that if they did voice that opinion democratically, that such a thing should be respected, even if they are a flawed and imperfect capitalist society.
They all seemed to be very certain the Taiwanese people desire a kind of integration into China that would essentially make them either a puppet state or perhaps nominally democratic province.
Well, look at the results. Only 40% voted for the DPP. 60% voted against the DPP. It’s just the 2 more pro-China parties got their vote split. Not so in their congress which is now mostly KMT.
So if we take the popular vote, Taiwan voted for status quo, not Independence. China’s noticed that and that’s why they’re not doing another blockade.
But that goes against your narrative so I’ll bet you downvote me and ignore the actual votes that do not support your argument.
Cool, uh, anyway, in Taiwan the President is directly elected by popular vote.
So the majority of Taiwanese voted for a President who opposes greater integration/interference/subservience to, whatever you wanna say, with or to China.
In fact this would seemingly necessarily mean that the only way this could happen along with the DPP not also winning a majority in Parliament is that a good chunk of Taiwanese support the KMT and TPP for domestic affairs, but prefer a president, who has more power and relevance specifically to foreign affairs, that opposes integration/interference/subservience with/from/to China.
But please do go on about my narrative while you are either knowingly or unknowingly misrepresenting the most fundamental basics of the situation.
40% is not a majority.
You’re right, its a plurality. I misspoke.
Still doesn’t change any of the rest of what I said.
Hey at least I can admit and own up to a mistake!
Also worth noting, the TPP candidate, incumbent and now former President Ken Wen-je, is in favor of the status quo with China, in terms of their governmental influence/dominion, meaning continued independent governance when it comes to sovereignty, though this does mean significant economic partnership, in uh, economic terms.
So that’s actually roughly 65% of Taiwanese voting for a President that seem to not want Taiwan to become a part of China.
Which would be… a majority.
Damn near a super majority, as us filthy consumeristic and vapid Americans might say.
To actually attempt to venture into the Narrative Construction Zone, one might say that despite one major party in Taiwan with close positions and ties to the Chines Government itself, the momentum seems to be in favor of moving toward /less/ interference from/subservience to/ integration with China, especially where matters of sovereignty are concerned.
Shows how little you understand. KMT wants the status quo, TPP wants to engage China.
And at this point I am sure that when you say that you mean the status quo of Taiwan has always been a part of China.
You are wrong, but keep pushing that narrative!
See, you don’t know and try to force your narrative on others. And if we actual Taiwanese people tell you no, you mansplain it to us. This is why I hate people like you.
Hi, welcome to this community. Downvotes are not allowed here, and the main rule is to bee-nice, so no need to worry about Reddit-esque shenanigans.
China was using their Taiwanese propaganda group, KMT, to threaten voters prior to the election.
China and Taiwan’s main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT), have cast the election as a choice between war and peace. […] KMT presidential candidate Hou Yu-ih said on Saturday a vote for the DPP was equivalent to “sending everyone out to the battlefield” because supporting Taiwan independence would touch off a war.
And this is what China’s military aggression against Taiwan looked like between March 2022 and March 2023:
This is blatantly provocative and threatening.
China has been doing everything they can to manipulate the outcome of this election, and they didn’t get the results they wanted so now they’re whining about it, and making more threats. China is behaving like an abusive ex.
An independent public opinion poll conducted in 2022 found that 50% of Taiwanese favored independence, while only 12% favored unification and 25% preferred maintaining the status quo.
But that goes against your narrative so I’ll bet you downvote me and ignore the actual [data] that do not support your argument.
And when it came time to vote, that didn’t happen. So yeah your pills are biased.
I’m not sure if voting for an another party can be seen inherently as voting against someone else. I suppose that’s what it is but voting against seems like it would take an active part in the reason you’re voting, rather than just preferring another party.
It’s just the 2 more pro-China parties got their vote split.
If this was such an important election and Chinese relations were the major issue on the table, why would the two pro-China parties not ally themselves? Are coalitions not a thing in Taiwan?
Psst, here’s a secret, it wasn’t important. The western media made it seem way more important than it was. If it was so important and war could have actually happened, then it would have already.
What is still being debated in Taiwan is if it should declare independence officially, or accept the status quo of factual being independent without declaring it. This is where the three major parties have a different stance, because the DPP kinda tends to the declaration, while the KMT still declares that Taiwan is the legitimate China.
About the vote: All three major parties say publicly that they are against re-union in terms of being ruled by China’s CCP. Today, even Taiwan’s KMT continues to view Taiwan as the free, democratic and legitimate China. So no, no-one voted “pro mainland China” in terms of how the chinese CCP wants to rule over Taiwan.
Status quo is: Taiwan has its own from China independent border control, independent military, independent health care system, independent education system, independent currency, independent law system which is derrived from Japanese and German law, and independent political system, which is democratic.
This is not an opinion, but just the facts. It’s only CCPs rethoric that pretends the opposite.
Note: The following is what I heard from a friend who lived there for decades. I have visited Taiwan but I don’t have roots there, as such this is all I have to go on.
But as far as I’m told the drive for Status Quo is mainly because the Taiwanese people don’t want to pull out the red flag. They’d love to have independence and be recognised as a state but the status quo is good enough (because it de facto offers them independence in all but name) and less likely to lead to a major war. So basically right now they already have what they want and trying to formalise it will only put more pressure on the situation.
That is correct. Taiwanese people are generally ok with the situation and have what we want so don’t stir the pot. Also, I realize in that post I wrote pro-China. That’s incorrect, both the TPP and KMT are pro-negotiation with China which I am too and I dislike the DPP who wants to disengage. However, technically all parties are against independence.
To add my own personal opinion, I want people to stop talking about war and conflict with China because I think it’s hurting Taiwanese businesses. I believe if we just let things lay and don’t stoke the flames, Taiwan would prosper more.
*Edit: To expand upon my anger at people constantly saying China is going to war with Taiwan, who would invest in a nation that is going to war? It creates a situation where people think twice about investments. Better to keep our status quo and to stop talking about war entirely. Taiwan is free, this election clearly shows what we do and want is up to us. Stoking the flames of war only causes people to want to visit less and invest less. Taiwan is a beautiful place that is wonderful to visit. But if you think missiles are going to be lodged at Taiwan, you’re less likely to be a tourist. This is why I’m on the side of 60% of Taiwanese and with the TPP and KMT, TPP more than KMT but as a third party they get less votes. OK I’m rambling but I think you get it.
Yes I get it totally. I was there myself and it is indeed a wonderful place to visit. My friend lived there at the time and showed me around. I particularly loved the markets with all the wonderful electronic components. Though I believe most of that has moved to Shenzen these days, I was there two decades ago when Taiwan was a huge manufacturing hub. As far as I know it’s now more of a high-end semiconductor specialist.
What also suprised me is how Western Taipei felt. If everything weren’t in Chinese it could have been a western city (albeit with a lot more motorscooters :P ). And the whole situation with China doesn’t really seem to be a big ‘thing’ there. They are already deciding their own future and that’s not really up for discussion. This issue seems to be playing more in the global media than on the ground.
I don’t think a war will happen either. China is way too calculated for that. The CCP thinks in decade-long plans with subtle entanglement and exploitative loans, that’s also their MO in Africa. Not a shooting war.
Well, Chinese cities will seem western and modern to you as well. I have family in China also. The media twists everything that’s happening and well, I’m sick of it. I guess in some ways this is just me acting out.
My biggest issue is whenever USA has beef with China for God knows what, Taiwan gets dragged into whatever is going on. Leave us alone, that’s all I want. In this case it’s semiconductors.
The first Taiwan strait crisis was because USA wanted to beat up on China for the Korean war. Second crisis was a continuation of the first one.
The third Taiwan strait crisis was similar to Nancy Pelosi’s visit.
So from my personal point of view, it’s constantly the US stirring up trouble. Not everyone in Taiwan shares my views on this stuff. I’m at this point only talking what I believe.
But we all tend to agree to just keep our freedoms and the status quo.
*Edit I should add I dislike both China and the US and think they’re bullies. They’re bullies who bully each other and uses Taiwan as a flashpoint.
Thanks for your insights, it’s very interesting hearing the perspective from someone who is actually living there. I can imagine you feel used in this conflict.
Well, Chinese cities will seem western and modern to you as well.
True, I know, but I don’t think they did as much when I was in Taiwan 20+ years ago.
You have to wonder if they’ve ever actually met any Taiwanese people.
I actually had a tankie tell me that Chinese is not actually a bunch of what us Americans would actually more properly call different languages altogether, when I told a story about a friend I knew from Hong Kong, speaking Cantonese and a little a English, had to actually go through me (Cantonese, English, capable of translating Cantonese to Vietnamese, but not Mandarin, because my phone waa bugging out), and a nearby Vietnamese shopkeep (Vietnamese, some Mandarin) to communicate to someone who only spoke Mandarin, and effectively nearly no English.
We did this comical routine of my friend typing Cantonese into my phone, translating it to Vietnamese, then to Mandarin via the shopkeep, then to the Mandarin speaking woman, then all the way back the other way, for about 20 minutes, to have a conversation that probably could otherwise have been had in 3 minutes.
There are in fact many regional /dialects/ of Chinese (beyond just Cantonese) that are actually so different that it is very common that one who can only speak one /dialect/ cannot actually communicate nearly at all with someone who knows only a different /dialect/.
I am putting /'s around dialect because actually a growing number of translators who know one or many of these /dialects/, as well as English, think it is more accurate to describe them as being different languages to those who speak English.
Anyway, yeah, had a tankie chew me out for pointing this out and call me a ‘gusano’, which is incredible because this is an insult popularized by Castro against counter revolutionaries.
I am an anarchist, and gusano is Spanish for maggot or worm.
It was truly a ludicrous exchange.
Perhaps China will offer them “One Country, Two Systems”. Because they respected this so amazingly well with Hong Kong.
