• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just How stupid does one have to be to think all their woes exist with only one generation? There are far bigger monsters alive today in current younger generations (many in millennial) that are far more destructive to our lives and the earth. They’ve seen more $$$ than any boomer and will laugh at you while you live out of a garbage can.

    And you’d still probably be posting stupid memes like this acting completely oblivious to the burning hell around you.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re framing your indignation from a place of generality. No one thinks that boomers are the sole source of the World’s woes. However, they are the largest generation and tend to dominate discussions surrounding housing and the economy. They also make up a huge portion of the elected officials in North America, and younger generations have had it much harder than boomers ever did. It’s a lie that millennials and gen z have had more money than our parents and grandparents ever did. We don’t have nearly the purchasing power people did in the 50s and 60s.

      • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        millenials and gen z have far more purchasing power than anyone in human history. The problem is that purchasing power for specific things, like housing, has not experienced the same general trend. But the average person can buy more, say, tvs than people even in the 90s could.

      • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        So stop whining and vote! Remember: You will ALWAYS be voting for the lesser of two evils.

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or write in someone you believe would actually be good at the job. Then you don’t have to vote for someone you believe to be unqualified.

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Choice 1: third party you prefer Choice 2: mainstream party you prefer Choice 3: mainstream party you don’t prefer that gives off apocalyptic vibes

                This is what I was trying to describe. It’s the same old US third party voting trap as always.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              …as long as choice #3 isn’t apocalyptically bad, right?

              Right?

              That’s only true if everyone believes that, a self-fulfilling prophecy.

              Would really be fantastic to see just once, one time, everyone interconnects on social media and agrees to vote on a third party, as an experiment if nothing else, to finally prove/disprove that theory.

              Funny enough these newer generations have this communicative interconnectivity of the Internet available to them, that previous generations didn’t have, but they don’t seem to use it, instead they just share mene pics/vids, etc.

              Could you imagine the political earthquake though if a third party actually won? Would be glorious to see.

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                The problem there isn’t that we (assuming the US) don’t want third parties, it’s that our voting system encourages party consolidation rather than cooperation. That only gets more true the higher in the government you go.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The problem there isn’t that we (assuming the US) don’t want third parties,

                  That’s not true. People don’t vote for third party because of the self-fulfilling prophecy, but it doesn’t mean they don’t want it. They also want ranked-choice voting.

                  I would advocate to put that self-fulfilling prophecy to the test, even if just as an experiment one time.

                  • Zink@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I think you’re agreeing with me there. People want other choices, but they get ignored because they have no chance of winning.

                    It would be great if we couple coordinate and just try it one year, but change needs to be able to happen gradually too. Our system in practice actively punishes third party voting by your vote benefiting the major party you DON’T want.

                    I bet people would want ranked choice or similar if given the option. I think the establishment really doesn’t like that idea and actively works against it, though.

    • havokdj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Click on the site so that your dumbass can see there is a clock for literally every generarion up until the Greatest